Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 10601

Received: 13/11/2020

Respondent: Miss Amanda Poulton

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

I disagree with this policy because you have stated that sacrificing green belt land will be to improve environment quality. For the local residents I feel this is not true. Green belt has been has been destroyed for JLR and possibly for the relocation of Bickenhill Waste Disposal Facility. I do not see how this improving the environment for Damsonwood residents when this will bring more noise and pollution to the area. In the Damsonwood area green belt is not being destroyed to improving housing demands.

Change suggested by respondent:

Relocate Bickenhill Waste Disposal unit to another location this is not going to benefit the local residents.

Full text:

I disagree with this policy because you have stated that sacrificing green belt land will be to improve environment quality. For the local residents I feel this is not true. Green belt has been has been destroyed for JLR and possibly for the relocation of Bickenhill Waste Disposal Facility. I do not see how this improving the environment for Damsonwood residents when this will bring more noise and pollution to the area. In the Damsonwood area green belt is not being destroyed to improving housing demands.