Object
Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020
Representation ID: 10799
Received: 12/12/2020
Respondent: Mel Starling
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
This site was rejected in the 2013 master plan as being unsuitable because of the topography of the land. Nothing has changed make it suitable now.
I dispute the assertion that building on this land would "round off" the settlement in a logical manner , Wychwood Avenue is very separate because of the Nature reserve and stream, and Hampton Road houses finish opposite Grimshaw Hall which already forms a logical border to the village.
There is nothing logical about taking green belt to move a football club far from the centre of the village, next to the tranquil canal.
No provision for the impact on the residents of Chantry Heath Crescent i.e planting trees or a green buffer. Grimshaw Hall is barely visible from Hampton Road yet it is afforded a huge buffer from the development.Unfair.
Low density housing should be built behind Chantry Heath Crescent to mirror the existing housing and not adjacent to a football complex.
Will the football complex be for public use and who will maintain it ?.
This site was rejected in the 2013 master plan as being unsuitable because of the topography of the land. Nothing has changed make it suitable now.
I dispute the assertion that building on this land would "round off" the settlement in a logical manner , Wychwood Avenue is very separate because of the Nature reserve and stream, and Hampton Road houses finish opposite Grimshaw Hall which already forms a logical border to the village.
There is nothing logical about taking green belt to move a football club far from the centre of the village, next to the tranquil canal.