Object

Representation ID: 10856

Received: 13/12/2020

Respondent: Howard Farrand

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Selection of site inconsistent with the feedback provided by residents during the “developer consultations” undertaken - brownfield sites not prioritised - the overall accessibility assessment does not meet the Council’s own criteria - release of RP59 from the green belt would actively threaten adjoining parts and generate pressure for urban sprawl contrary to the green belt purposes - increased traffic flow/congestion - destruction of greenbelt and wildlife - lack of weighting given to this effect on the village community makes this proposal fundamentally unsound