I think the policy in P6 is rather extraordinary. All the objections one might make to building on the Frog Lane site are only applied to travelers! institutional discrimination or no money to be made out of them?
- The and scale of a travellers site appropriate to size/density of local "settled" community;
- Unacceptable adverse visual impact adequately minimised (Frog Land is on a raised plot!);
- The site is not in an area prone to flooding. (Frog lance site is!
- Adverse impact on landscape or local nature conservation designations, ecology, biodiversity etc.
- site has safe and convenient access to the highway network;
Local services and facilities accessible by walking/cycling
- Sites in Green-Belt only considered and in "very special circumstances!