I live at no 43 and was not one of those formally notified.
For now at least the land should remain green belt
It would seem the designation is being debated following the description
In the Site Assessment Document dated Jan this year at pp393 ff
The sustainable appraisal there is not one sided but it is difficult to comment
Because the reasoning behind the various judgements is unspecified
The built development in Kixley Lane was commissioned by the Council
For those then working locally in agriculture and is now a conservation area
And of local historic interest
Those on the westerly boundary fewer in number but more substantial were allocated
To those working locally particularly I am told in the Health Service
So the ribbon on either side is unlikely to be extended
The Shella heading may well merit re examination of the economic aspect because of growing uncertainty regarding inter alia the importance of retaining good quality
Agricultural land
So in summary leave as is unless compelling reasons for alteration based on experience following 1/4/2019