Comment

Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation

Representation ID: 9000

Received: 15/03/2019

Respondent: Councillor Max McLoughlin

Representation Summary:

This section has not been delivered in an appropriate manner to elicit valuable contributions. The wording is confusing, and I expect there will be fewer responses, though with greater inconsistency.
If so, this will raise questions over the contribution that responses to this section make to the consultation. This can be addressed, in future, with an explanation that would adhere to the Crystal Mark standard of Plain English. Mapping alongside the questions is a simple addition that would elicit clearer and more indicative responses.

Full text:

As per Q34, the question is not clear for respondents.