Q15. Do you believe we are planning to build new homes in the right locations? If not why not, and which locations do you believe shouldn't be included? Are there any other locations that you think

No

Representation ID: 6097

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Tidbury Green Golf Club

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Many of the proposed Housing Allocations on non-Green Belt sites in the urban area will result in the loss of existing employment, retail and community use land, sports and recreation facilities and open space. The housing estimates appear over optimistic in some cases and issues of viability remain to be proven.

No

Representation ID: 6102

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs A Curtis

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Policy P5: Policy justification should include SHELAA Site Ref: 19 in the summary of allocated sites and within Appendix C, for Rural Exception Site housing development in first 5 years of plan period.

No

Representation ID: 6103

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs A Curtis

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Insufficient housing land provided, more Green Belt release required, or at least provide safeguarded sites.
Too many large sites in too few areas have been proposed, contrary to Government's commitment to delivery across range of site sizes.
Will result in disproportionate pressure on services and facilities, and community cohesion.
Better to distribute housing across Borough, particularly close to public transport.
Many proposed sites will result in displacement of community facilities, e.g. sport pitches. VSC for outdoor sport and recreation in Green Belt would be difficult to prove if alternative GB sites available that do not require loss of such facilities.

No

Representation ID: 6111

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs A Curtis

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Policy P5: Contend that windfall supply will not continue at past rates. Insufficient grounds for continuing with such a high windfall allowance. Furthermore, such sites are unlikely to contribute to affordable housing due to lower site size.
Absence of evidence to support record of delivery on Rural Exceptions Sites, therefore more should be allocated.

No

Representation ID: 6112

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs A Curtis

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Rural Exception Sites:
None in the DLP, in spite of a continuing and increasing need for affordable housing.
A larger site than currently proposed as a Rural Exception Site has been assessed for open market housing, whilst promoting the site as Rural Exception Site in DLP under the supporting text of Policy P4.

No

Representation ID: 6116

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs A Curtis

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Over-concentration of growth in south-west of Borough with sites 4, 11, 12 and 13.
800 more dwellings than Dickens Heath (1,642 units).
Land to south of Sites 12 and 13 has no clear defensible Green Belt boundary.
Significant extension to Shirley area.
Will cause coalescence of settlements in Shirley, Dickens Heath, Cheswick Green, Majors Green and Whitlocks End.
Adverse impact on existing communities and infrastructure.
Landscape character in this area sensitive to change (LCA, 2016), cannot accommodate development of this scale.

No

Representation ID: 6120

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs A Curtis

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

22% increase in dwellings in Knowle. Overconcentration of growth in rural village.
Will have significant and potentially unacceptable adverse impact on the existing community and infrastructure.
Difficult to assimilate new and existing communities at that scale.
Arden Academy has undergone a significant number of upgrades and extensions in recent years, which undermines need and cost justification of brand new secondary school.
Smaller-scaled development in Knowle/Dorridge could allow improvements at the school via CIL/S106s, and wouldn't require a rebuild.

No

Representation ID: 6123

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs A Curtis

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Illogical and unsound that no suitable land has been proposed for housing in Dorridge:
Excellent transport links (bus and rail),
New shopping centre,
Excellent community facilities (park, wildlife areas, cricket club).

No

Representation ID: 6128

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs A Curtis

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Over-concentration of growth on large sites in the wrong location adjacent to the detached rural village of Balsall Common. Scale of development equals a 39% increase in village population.
Development south of settlement will have a significant and potentially unacceptable adverse impact on the existing community and infrastructure such as the road network and education.
Proposed allocations do not accord with sustainable development principles of the NPPF and therefore unsound.

No

Representation ID: 6129

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs A Curtis

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Limited available land resource in Solihull Town Centre. Brownfield development dependent on masterplanning.
Concern the scale of housing will jeopardise the ability of the centre to adapt to changing and expanding needs of new and existing businesses, retail and community facilities.
Calls into question the viability, achievability and deliverability.

No

Representation ID: 6132

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs A Curtis

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Many of the proposed Housing Allocations on non-Green Belt sites in the urban area will result in the loss of existing employment, retail and community use land, sports and recreation facilities and open space. The housing estimates appear over optimistic in some cases and issues of viability remain to be proven.

No

Representation ID: 6138

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Policy P5: Policy justification should include SHELAA Site Ref:1017 in the summary of allocated sites and within Appendix C, for housing development in first 5 years of plan period.

No

Representation ID: 6139

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Insufficient housing land provided, more Green Belt release required, or at least provide safeguarded sites.
Too many large sites in too few areas have been proposed, contrary to Government's commitment to delivery across range of site sizes.
Will result in disproportionate pressure on services and facilities, and community cohesion.
Better to distribute housing across Borough, particularly close to public transport.
Many proposed sites will result in displacement of community facilities, e.g. sport pitches. VSC for outdoor sport and recreation in Green Belt would be difficult to prove if alternative GB sites available that do not require loss of such facilities.

No

Representation ID: 6147

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Over-concentration of growth in south-west of Borough with sites 4, 11, 12 and 13.
800 more dwellings than Dickens Heath (1,642 units).
Land to south of Sites 12 and 13 has no clear defensible Green Belt boundary.
Significant extension to Shirley area.
Will cause coalescence of settlements in Shirley, Dickens Heath, Cheswick Green, Majors Green and Whitlocks End.
Adverse impact on existing communities and infrastructure.
Landscape character in this area sensitive to change (LCA, 2016), cannot accommodate development of this scale.

No

Representation ID: 6151

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

22% increase in dwellings in Knowle. Overconcentration of growth in rural village.
Will have significant and potentially unacceptable adverse impact on the existing community and infrastructure.
Difficult to assimilate new and existing communities at that scale.
Arden Academy has undergone a significant number of upgrades and extensions in recent years, which undermines need and cost justification of brand new secondary school.
Smaller-scaled development in Knowle/Dorridge could allow improvements at the school via CIL/S106s, and wouldn't require a rebuild.

No

Representation ID: 6159

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Over-concentration of growth on large sites in the wrong location adjacent to the detached rural village of Balsall Common. Scale of development equals a 39% increase in village population.
Development south of settlement will have a significant and potentially unacceptable adverse impact on the existing community and infrastructure such as the road network and education.
Proposed allocations do not accord with sustainable development principles of the NPPF and therefore unsound.

No

Representation ID: 6160

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Limited available land resource in Solihull Town Centre. Brownfield development dependent on masterplanning.
Concern the scale of housing will jeopardise the ability of the centre to adapt to changing and expanding needs of new and existing businesses, retail and community facilities.
Calls into question the viability, achievability and deliverability.

No

Representation ID: 6163

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Many of the proposed Housing Allocations on non-Green Belt sites in the urban area will result in the loss of existing employment, retail and community use land, sports and recreation facilities and open space. The housing estimates appear over optimistic in some cases and issues of viability remain to be proven.

No

Representation ID: 6168

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: the Client

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Policy P5: Policy justification should include SHELAA Site Ref:16 and 17 in the summary of allocated sites and within Appendix C, for housing development in first 5 years of plan period.

No

Representation ID: 6169

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: the Client

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Insufficient housing land provided, more Green Belt release required, or at least provide safeguarded sites.
Too many large sites in too few areas have been proposed, contrary to Government's commitment to delivery across range of site sizes.
Will result in disproportionate pressure on services and facilities, and community cohesion.
Better to distribute housing across Borough, particularly close to public transport.
Many proposed sites will result in displacement of community facilities, e.g. sport pitches. VSC for outdoor sport and recreation in Green Belt would be difficult to prove if alternative GB sites available that do not require loss of such facilities.

No

Representation ID: 6177

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: the Client

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Over-concentration of growth in south-west of Borough with sites 4, 11, 12 and 13.
800 more dwellings than Dickens Heath (1,642 units).
Land to south of Sites 12 and 13 has no clear defensible Green Belt boundary.
Significant extension to Shirley area.
Will cause coalescence of settlements in Shirley, Dickens Heath, Cheswick Green, Majors Green and Whitlocks End.
Adverse impact on existing communities and infrastructure.
Landscape character in this area sensitive to change (LCA, 2016), cannot accommodate development of this scale.

No

Representation ID: 6181

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: the Client

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

22% increase in dwellings in Knowle. Overconcentration of growth in rural village.
Will have significant and potentially unacceptable adverse impact on the existing community and infrastructure.
Difficult to assimilate new and existing communities at that scale.
Arden Academy has undergone a significant number of upgrades and extensions in recent years, which undermines need and cost justification of brand new secondary school.
Smaller-scaled development in Knowle/Dorridge could allow improvements at the school via CIL/S106s, and wouldn't require a rebuild.

No

Representation ID: 6189

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: the Client

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Over-concentration of growth on large sites in the wrong location adjacent to the detached rural village of Balsall Common. Scale of development equals a 39% increase in village population.
Development south of settlement will have a significant and potentially unacceptable adverse impact on the existing community and infrastructure such as the road network and education.
Proposed allocations do not accord with sustainable development principles of the NPPF and therefore unsound.

No

Representation ID: 6190

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: the Client

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Limited available land resource in Solihull Town Centre. Brownfield development dependent on masterplanning.
Concern the scale of housing will jeopardise the ability of the centre to adapt to changing and expanding needs of new and existing businesses, retail and community facilities.
Calls into question the viability, achievability and deliverability.

No

Representation ID: 6193

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: the Client

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Many of the proposed Housing Allocations on non-Green Belt sites in the urban area will result in the loss of existing employment, retail and community use land, sports and recreation facilities and open space. The housing estimates appear over optimistic in some cases and issues of viability remain to be proven.

No

Representation ID: 6199

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Policy P5: Policy justification should include identified part of SHELAA Site Ref:64 in the summary of allocated sites as a Rural Exception Site and within Appendix C, for housing development in first 5 years of plan period.

No

Representation ID: 6200

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Insufficient housing land provided, more Green Belt release required, or at least provide safeguarded sites.
Too many large sites in too few areas have been proposed, contrary to Government's commitment to delivery across range of site sizes.
Will result in disproportionate pressure on services and facilities, and community cohesion.
Better to distribute housing across Borough, particularly close to public transport.
Many proposed sites will result in displacement of community facilities, e.g. sport pitches. VSC for outdoor sport and recreation in Green Belt would be difficult to prove if alternative GB sites available that do not require loss of such facilities.

No

Representation ID: 6201

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Policy P5: Contend that windfall supply will not continue at past rates. Insufficient grounds for continuing with such a high windfall allowance. Furthermore, such sites are unlikely to contribute to affordable housing due to lower site size.
Absence of evidence to support record of delivery on Rural Exceptions Sites, therefore more should be allocated.

No

Representation ID: 6209

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Rural Exception Sites:
None in the DLP, in spite of a continuing and increasing need for affordable housing.
A larger site than currently proposed as a Rural Exception Site has been assessed for open market housing, whilst promoting the site as Rural Exception Site in DLP under the supporting text of Policy P4.

No

Representation ID: 6214

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Over-concentration of growth in south-west of Borough with sites 4, 11, 12 and 13.
800 more dwellings than Dickens Heath (1,642 units).
Land to south of Sites 12 and 13 has no clear defensible Green Belt boundary.
Significant extension to Shirley area.
Will cause coalescence of settlements in Shirley, Dickens Heath, Cheswick Green, Majors Green and Whitlocks End.
Adverse impact on existing communities and infrastructure.
Landscape character in this area sensitive to change (LCA, 2016), cannot accommodate development of this scale.