06 Hampton-in-Arden - Meriden Road

No

Representation ID: 1970

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Hampton-in-Arden Parish Council and Catherine-de-Barnes Residents' Association

Object to housing site 6 as together with Site 24 in the SLP2013 the target number for the combined site would increase housing stock by some 25% and be unsustainable with current facilities, fails to meet accessibility criteria in Plan, fails to acknowledge contribution of several housing developments in the Parish that have been agreed/completed to overall housing number, and fails to provide compensating open space to replace that proposed in the SLP2013. However, would have no objection to sympathetic development of combined site incorporating significant open space which retains and enhances footpath access to village.

Yes

Representation ID: 1979

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Wood Shavings Ltd

Agent: Stansgate Planning LLP

Support the allocation of the Meriden Road Depot as part of site 6. The boundary of the allocated site should be adjusted to reflect the Depot site boundary, through the development of the concept masterplan for the site. To ensure delivery, clarification of the site's relationship with site 24 in the SLP2013 is required

No

Representation ID: 2049

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Hampton-in-Arden Society

Object to housing site 6 as together with Site 24 in the SLP2013 the target number for the combined site would increase housing stock by some 25% and be unsustainable with current facilities, fails to meet accessibility criteria in Plan, fails to acknowledge contribution of several housing developments in the Parish that have been agreed/completed to overall housing number, and fails to provide compensating open space to replace that proposed in the SLP2013. However, would have no objection to sympathetic development of combined site incorporating significant open space which retains and enhances footpath access to village.

No

Representation ID: 3835

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: John Parker

Agent: DS Planning

Land to the west of this site was allocated for housing in the 2013 Local Plan on condition that the former ammunition depot was reclaimed for open space or
if not available an alternative development solution delivering additional open space was forthcoming.
This situation still exists and so calls into question the allocation.
Viability may be affected by contamination issues due to previous use.

No

Representation ID: 3866

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Ron Shiels

Agent: DS Planning

Land to the west of this site was allocated for housing in the 2013 Local Plan on condition that the former ammunition depot was reclaimed for open space or
if not available an alternative development solution delivering additional open space was forthcoming.
This situation still exists and so calls into question the allocation.
Viability may be affected by contamination issues due to previous use.

Yes

Representation ID: 3893

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Packington Estate Enterprises Ltd

Agent: Arcadis

Packington Estate supports the removal of the land from the Green Belt and the allocation of the extended Meriden Road site for housing but does not consider the delivery timescale to be appropriate or justified.

No

Representation ID: 3972

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Rosconn Stategic Land

Agent: DS Planning

Land to the west of this site was allocated for housing in the 2013 Local Plan on condition that the former ammunition depot was reclaimed for open space or
if not available an alternative development solution delivering additional open space was forthcoming.
This situation still exists and so calls into question the allocation.
Viability may be affected by contamination issues due to previous use.

No

Representation ID: 4011

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd

Agent: DS Planning

Land to the west of this site was allocated for housing in the 2013 Local Plan on condition that the former ammunition depot was reclaimed for open space or
if not available an alternative development solution delivering additional open space was forthcoming.
This situation still exists and so calls into question the allocation.
Viability may be affected by contamination issues due to previous use.

No

Representation ID: 4056

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Stonewater

Agent: DS Planning

Land to the west of this site was allocated for housing in the 2013 Local Plan on condition that the former ammunition depot was reclaimed for open space or
if not available an alternative development solution delivering additional open space was forthcoming.
This situation still exists and so calls into question the allocation.
Viability may be affected by contamination issues due to previous use.

No

Representation ID: 4841

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane

Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd

Not a logical site to redevelop as it is physically separated from the edge of Meriden. Narrow site frontage would make it difficult for development to have any street presence or positive contribution to the street scene.

No

Representation ID: 4895

Received: 17/03/2017

Respondent: Persons with an interest Site 9

Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd

Not a logical site to redevelop as it is physically separated from the edge of Meriden. Narrow site frontage would make it difficult for development to have any street presence or positive contribution to the street scene.

No

Representation ID: 6253

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Packington Estate Enterprises Ltd

Packington Estate supports the inclusion of 'proposal allocation' Site 6, Meriden Road, Hampton-in-Arden to include the addition of the extension areas to the south and east.
In reviewing the evidence based documents that will support the Local Plan, it is evident that additional evidence is required.