08 Knowle - Hampton Road
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5539
Received: 18/02/2017
Respondent: Ana & Mark Spittle McGuire
Highlights need for increase in primary school facilities for new housing proposals in Knowle and Dickens Heath, in particular impact on St George and St Teresa school which has been unable to expand and is forced to exclude children in parish and with siblings at school, and whose catchment includes new developments at Balsall Common, Hockley Heath and Blythe Valley as well as Knowle/Dorridge, which should be addressed as a matter of priority.
Development Knowle and Dorridge
In response to the Draft Local Plan Review I/we would like to highlight the need for increase in primary education proposed in Items 4, 8 and 9.
This directly impacts on the education of my child/children at St George & St Teresa RC School and we request to be considered in the planning of this provision going forward.
During recent years local development has been substantial and whilst Local Authority Schools in the area have been increased to meet demand St George & St Teresa has not. We have been forced to exclude children in parish and with siblings in our school.
The size of our catchment area to include new developments at Balsall Common, Hockley Heath and additional potential impact from Blythe Valley, as well as Knowle & Dorridge demonstrates a need which should be addressed
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5853
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: P Benton & T Neary
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Review of evidence:
SHELAA - Category 1 sites. Larger site to the north not considered within/adjacent to free standing village. Trees will need to be considered.
GBA - Combined score of 7. Should be 11 to account for significant contribution football club makes to GB. Other sites, e.g. have lower scores.
LCA - Considered a 'low' capacity to accommodate change.
Interim SA - Development would lead to net ecological loss.
Loss of well-used sports facility.
Removal from Green Belt not justified by NPPF.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at and to the rear of 146- 152 Tilehouse Lane, Whitlock's End, B90 1PW.
The submission comprises the
* letter of representations (10463 HRW LPR APP);
* a site plan (ref.no. 10463-01A) with the site edged red;
* an Illustrative layout (10463(10)M-101 prepared by Tyler-Parkes Partnership
* a Transport Statement prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering Ltd
* An updated Extended Phase I Habitat Survey prepared by Cotswold Wildlife Surveys
* Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy prepared by BWB
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6086
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Tidbury Green Golf Club
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Review of evidence:
SHELAA - Category 1 sites. Larger site to the north not considered within/adjacent to free standing village. Trees will need to be considered.
GBA - Combined score of 7. Should be 11 to account for significant contribution football club makes to GB. Other sites, e.g. have lower scores.
LCA - Considered a 'low' capacity to accommodate change.
Interim SA - Development would lead to net ecological loss.
Loss of well-used sports facility.
Removal from Green Belt not justified by NPPF.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the site at Tidbury Green Golf Club, Tidbury Green.
The submission comprises
* The letter of representations (10171 LPA3 LPR APP)
* An existing site plan (ref.no. 10509(EX)01) with the site edged red.
* Schedule of accommodation (10509(SC)01)
* Illustrative Site Layout (10509(MP)01)
* Ecological Appraisal prepared by Crossman Associates
* Environmental Noise Report prepared by Sharps Redmore
* Flood Risk Assessment prepared by THDA
* Tree Survey prepared by Abbey Forestry
* Transport Statement and Travel Plan prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering
* Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment prepared by Landscape Matters
* Site Investigation Report prepared by Georisk UK
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6121
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs A Curtis
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Review of evidence:
SHELAA - Category 1 sites. Larger site to the north not considered within/adjacent to free standing village. Trees will need to be considered.
GBA - Combined score of 7. Should be 11 to account for significant contribution football club makes to GB. Other sites, e.g. have lower scores.
LCA - Considered a 'low' capacity to accommodate change.
Interim SA - Development would lead to net ecological loss.
Loss of well-used sports facility.
Removal from Green Belt not justified by NPPF.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at the rear of Bakehouse Lane and Wheeler Close, Chadwick End
The submission comprises the letter of representations (6439.LPA1.HMG LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 6439 site plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6152
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Review of evidence:
SHELAA - Category 1 sites. Larger site to the north not considered within/adjacent to free standing village. Trees will need to be considered.
GBA - Combined score of 7. Should be 11 to account for significant contribution football club makes to GB. Other sites, e.g. have lower scores.
LCA - Considered a 'low' capacity to accommodate change.
Interim SA - Development would lead to net ecological loss.
Loss of well-used sports facility.
Removal from Green Belt not justified by NPPF.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review on behalf of the landowners at the sites at Wootton Green Lane, Balsall Common.
The submission comprises
* the letter of representations (10607 LPA2 JD LPR APP);
* Site plan (10607(OS)01) with the site edged red;
* Illustrative layout (10607(MP)01);
* Transport Assessment prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering; and
* Landscape character assessment response prepared by Landscape Matters
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6182
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: the Client
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Review of evidence:
SHELAA - Category 1 sites. Larger site to the north not considered within/adjacent to free standing village. Trees will need to be considered.
GBA - Combined score of 7. Should be 11 to account for significant contribution football club makes to GB. Other sites, e.g. have lower scores.
LCA - Considered a 'low' capacity to accommodate change.
Interim SA - Development would lead to net ecological loss.
Loss of well-used sports facility.
Removal from Green Belt not justified by NPPF.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land south of Hampton Lane, and west of Ravenshaw Lane/ South of Hampton Lane, Solihull.
The submission comprises the letter of representations (9263 SHL LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 9263 Site Plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6219
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Review of evidence:
SHELAA - Category 1 sites. Larger site to the north not considered within/adjacent to free standing village. Trees will need to be considered.
GBA - Combined score of 7. Should be 11 to account for significant contribution football club makes to GB. Other sites, e.g. have lower scores.
LCA - Considered a 'low' capacity to accommodate change.
Interim SA - Development would lead to net ecological loss.
Loss of well-used sports facility.
Removal from Green Belt not justified by NPPF.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land at Barston Lane/ Oak Lane, Barston B92 0JR
The submission comprises the letter of representations (10445 LA3 GC LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 10445-01A) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6358
Received: 09/02/2017
Respondent: Alison Leah
The proposed developments for new housing in Knowle are inappropriate and contradictory to the Council's stated criteria.
The proposals for Knowle are too big. The proposed numbers of houses are far too big and disproportionate
both for the Knowle area and as part of the Borough
plan. The infrastructure of Knowle and Dorridge will not be able to support such a large development. Local public transport networks are inadequate and the result will be a massive increase in car travel, parking problems, roadie congestion and environmental pollution. Smaller developments of fewer, but affordable houses, for young families and first time buyers will be much more suitable. In suggesting the current plan for Knowle the Council is going against many of it's stated objectives with regard to appropriateness etc.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6372
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: The Knowle Society
Site 8 objections:
North eastern boundary is located on one of Knowle's highest points. 2-3 storey dwellings will create an unacceptable skyline in Knowle.
Mixed development will create an image of a town rather than village.
Will detract from Conservation Area status.
Village status will be lost due to vast increase in population.
Unlikely that density can be achieved due to hard constraints such as trees.
Loss of wildlife. Will require land for wildlife buffer.
Will require traffic calming measures.
Enlarged sports complex is inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
Scale of development will create urban sprawl.
Please find attached the Response of The Knowle Society to your Consultation of the draft Local Plan 2017 Review.