10 Meriden - West of Meriden
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 115
Received: 07/12/2016
Respondent: Miss Katie Mitchell
Happy that more houses are to be built in Meriden. Need build to rent sector in Meriden.
Hi, I wanted to contact regarding the leopard housing plans for Meriden villiage. I have currently lived in the villiage for 6 & half years now am love living here. I have 2 children living in a very small 2 bedroom house with no storage and of which one room is of box room size. I am currently carrying my third child and will be looking to need a bigger rented house. Firstly I'd like to know if the planning of these new houses go ahead, how would someone like me be able to apply for one of these homes? Will they be open to current Meriden residents first? I have been trying for a couple years to move now though everywhere in Meriden is mainly houses to buy. This is the place my children have grown up, they go to school here and I work here, I do not want to move from the villiage. I am very happy to hear that there is a proposal for more houses here though I am worried who they will be given to. Our village is very calm and a lovely area for my children to live an! d I don't want that spoit. I also worry about the expanding school classes as my sons current class is already one of the biggest of the school as due to accommodating the last new builds. I have also tried contacting yourselves previously for myself to be on the council list to be able to big for a new property with no look in knowing how to gain access to this.
Many thanks
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 157
Received: 15/12/2016
Respondent: Morrison Mobile home Ltd
Agent: Mr Ronald Perrin
Site 10 Meriden. Need additional mobile homes at the existing residential mobile home site at Meriden Hall Mobile Home Park. Green Belt boundary of Meriden also needs to be amended in this location.
see letter from agent
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 364
Received: 19/01/2017
Respondent: Rebecca Billingsley
Object to the site allocation for a number of reasons, including that developments are leading to an increase in the crime levels.
see attached written comments
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 1977
Received: 16/02/2017
Respondent: Mr David McGrath
Views of Meriden residents expressed at a public meeting on 6 December 2016, supporting rejection of around 10 submitted sites, supporting some small scale developments to meet local needs, such as older persons accommodation, expressing concern about additional traffic and parking problems and engineering solutions to resolve them, further strain on schools, nursery places and medical practices, cumulative impact of developments at Balsall Common and Arden Cross which should be addressed or the development opposed, and noting that whilst site 10 is in the green belt, evidence indicated this was not a strongly performing area.
submitted to advise of views expressed by members of the public (residents of Meriden ) at an open public meeting 16th December 2016
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 2537
Received: 14/02/2017
Respondent: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust
Contains fields that are identified as a potential Local Wildlife Site.
The LWS panel should be commissioned to survey and assess this site against the LWS criteria as a priority so as to inform the scheme design.
LWS areas should be protected and enhanced as part of the development.
Protection and enhancement of the LWS should be added to the likely infrastructure requirements.
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 2952
Received: 14/02/2017
Respondent: Mr Neil McCall
development is not supported on this site as it:
- increases pressure/demand on schools and medical facilities
- increase in traffic
- parking in the village already at a premium
- effect on character of village
More needs to be done to find brownfield land in the urban area before building on greenfield.
see attached letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 2956
Received: 14/02/2017
Respondent: Judy McCall
development is not supported on this site as it:
- increases pressure/demand on schools and medical facilities
- increase in traffic
- parking in the village already at a premium
- effect on character of village
More needs to be done to find brownfield land in the urban area before building on greenfield.
see attached letter
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 3115
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Meriden Parish Council
Support for LPR site allocation 10. The site of the former garage on the north side of Birmingham Road, already has planning permission for housing. The adjacent land currently used for caravan parking and part of the adjoining field could form an attractive small housing development near the centre of the village, local shops and transport. Its accessibility and proximity to shops and other facilities would make it an ideal location for more older persons' accommodation in the village.
see attached letter
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 3744
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Landowner Land at Birmingham Road Meriden
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Allocation will meet objectives of Growth Option F.
Will meet national policy requirements to delivery sustainable development on available, suitable, viable and achievable land.
Represents a logical sustainable westwards expansion of Meriden.
Clear, defensible Green Belt boundaries.
No known legal or physical constraints.
Could be brought forward in first five years of plan period.
No site specific designations.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land West of Meriden (Housing Allocation 10).
The submission comprises the letter of representations (6074 LPA2 GC) and a site plan (ref.no. 6074 Site Plan) with the site edged red
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4051
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Stonewater
Agent: DS Planning
Support inclusion of Firs, Maxstoke Lane, part of allocated site 10.
see attached
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6294
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Landowner Land at Birmingham Road Meriden
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Review of evidence -
SHELAA Ref. 19:
Unclear why contaminated land/landfill is mentioned. No reference on EA's website.
Erroneous reference to a LWS on-site.
Suitability score should be changed to 3.
Broadly agree with SA, except erroneous reference to LWS onsite.
Agree with findings in Green Belt Assessment, Accessibility Study, Landscape Character Assessment.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land West of Meriden (Housing Allocation 10).
The submission comprises the letter of representations (6074 LPA2 GC) and a site plan (ref.no. 6074 Site Plan) with the site edged red