No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6502
Received: 13/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Sally Woodhall
In relation to Site 13:
Not enough parking at Shirley and Whitlock's End railway stations, cars parked on residential roads.
Loss of open space and amenity land.
Increased pressure on infrastructure.
Future flood risk.
Not enough parking at Shirley and Whitlock's End railway stations, cars parked on residential roads,
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6507
Received: 31/01/2017
Respondent: Mrs Wendy Wilson
In Balsall Common the necessary infrastructure to support any significant expansion must be identified and planned for alongside any development.
Please find attached the detailed report compiled by the BARRAGE action group in response to the Draft Local Plan.
I believe you will have received many letters of objection already which make reference to this report.
Please note that the focus of the report responds to Q15 in the DLP in that we do not believe that sites 2 and 3 should be included in the plan and would propose that serious consideration should be given to the inclusion of site 240 instead.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6509
Received: 23/05/2017
Respondent: Mrs C Spelman MP
In relation to Site 16 -
Consider impact of new M42 junction on any development at Catherine de Barnes.
see letter to Chief Executive Nick Page
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6511
Received: 01/02/2017
Respondent: BC BARRAGE
Phasing of the 3 sites in Balsall Common will take place in years 1 - 5 at the same time as HS2 and Riddings Hill. This will see a strain on the settlement in terms of already overstretched infrastructure and facilities e.g. primary school. It contravenes SMBC's stated intent to "manage the growth."
The necessary infrastructure to support any significant expansion must be identified and planned for alongside any development.
see attached letter and report from BC BARRAGE action group
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6517
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Derek Forsythe
In relation to Site 4 and 13.
Support constructing cycle/walking lanes in and around proposed sites, in particular, those leading to Whitlocks End Railway Station.
Consideration should be given to carrying out road traffic flow measurements and analyses of all roads affected and come up with a solution that will link the proposed development sites with the A435 and A3400 roads, therefore preventing excessive traffic congestion in the Dickens Heath, Tidbury Green and Wythall Parish areas. Looking at the roads in and around Dickens Heath.
DRAFT LOCAL PLAN DECEMBER 2016
My understanding is that the SMBC Draft Local Plan dated December 2016 is a "non-statutory document" and hence residents will have the opportunity comment on the Final Local Plan when published, and at the Public Enquiry.
It's accepted that there is a growing need for the Borough Council to agree to the development of more residential properties in the area and this will, regrettably, mean building on Green Belt land. However, the prospect of using 85% green belt land, including an existing amenities area, is difficult to accept.
When you consider the existing construction sites, together with what's proposed by SMBC and Bromsgrove District Council (BDC), we are looking at just under 3800 new properties that border Wythall Parish, hence the already busy arterial route through the Majors Green and Tidbury Green will become even more heavily congested. Add the extension to the Whitlocks End Railway Station car park and the proposed new sports hub along Tilehouse Lane/Tythe Barn Lane and it's obvious that serious consideration must be given to the highways infrastructure.
You may not be aware that we've had 30 traffic accidents on a 300 metre stretch of Haslucks Green Road/Tilehouse Lane in Majors Green during the past 18 months, including one pedestrian badly injured as she walked along the pavement. Worcestershire County Council has made a number of improvements but long term a more practical solution must be found in order to negate the potential for a fatality.
During the next year, I am confident that SMBC will be addressing residents' concerns and undertaking many assessments in and around the proposed development sites including health care provisions, primary and secondary school capacity checks, ecological assessments, recreational considerations, road transport management, etc.
It is pleasing that SMBC intend constructing cycle/walking lanes in and around the construction sites, in particular, those leading to Whitlocks End Railway Station.
Consideration should be given to carrying out road traffic flow measurements and analyses of all roads affected and come up with a solution that will link the proposed development sites with the A435 and A3400 roads, therefore preventing excessive traffic congestion in the Dickens Heath, Tidbury Green and Wythall Parish areas. Looking at the roads in and around Dickens Heath, I urge SMBC to come up with a road system that will be an improvement on what can only be described as "shameful".
In addition to your Draft Local Plan, a further report, dated 16th Dec, has been issued by The Planning Inspectorate (Government) which looks at the pro and cons of housing development in the BDC area up to 2030. It refers to an additional 7000 properties for which they have land for 4700 only. The remainder may be built on Green Belt land. It does mention Wythall amongst other neighbouring areas (in Section 66 (Policy BDP5B) citing "large scale" settlements"
In summary, I trust that you will:
* Consider spreading the development sites more equally around the whole of the Borough rather than concentrate on Shirley and Dickens Heath areas.
* Seriously consider the impact on of constructing on Green Belt land
* Carry out a traffic flow survey in the Dickens Heath, Majors Green and Tidbury Green areas and undertake an analysis of the increase in traffic resulting from the ongoing and new developments
* Make it a condition that the development companies agree to fund the necessary improvements to existing highways, pavement lighting, and construction of new highways as required by your Final Plan
* Consider retaining the Amenities Area behind Badgers Estate
* Encourage Centro to extend the Whitlocks End Railway Station Car Park as soon as possible.
* Consider charging a parking fee at the existing and new Whitlocks End Railway Station to limit commuters from outlying areas using the facility
* Co-ordinate SMBC and BDC development plans
* Ensure Richborough proposed plan for the Sports Hub has adequate parking spaces for those who will use the facilities
* Consider constructing a Park and Ride facility in a strategic location in order to limit the traffic flow through urban areas