Draft Local Plan Review

Search representations

Results for Cannock Chase District Council search

New search New search

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?

Representation ID: 1961

Received: 15/02/2017

Respondent: Cannock Chase District Council

Representation Summary:

Support provision to meet Solihull's own housing needs.
Object to presenting 2,000 to meet HMA shortfall as a maximum.
HMA have not yet decided distribution of shortfall and Duty to Cooperate is on-going. No apparent mechanism for future flexibility, this is essential.
Such flexibility is obvious for employment growth agenda, including Policy P17 and Green Belt release.
Concern this will create unwelcome precedent and increase housing pressure in Zone of Influence surrounding the Cannock Chase SAC. Mitigation strategy underway.


Full text:

see attached letter

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q23. Are there any other comments you wish to make on the Draft Local Plan?

Representation ID: 2613

Received: 15/02/2017

Respondent: Cannock Chase District Council

Representation Summary:

Lack of HRA in evidence base.

Full text:

see attached letter

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q20. Do you agree with the policies for quality of place? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?

Representation ID: 2614

Received: 15/02/2017

Respondent: Cannock Chase District Council

Representation Summary:

Policy P17 - Paragraph 5.19.2 of the Sustainability Appraisal states that wording of Policy 17: Countryside and Green Belt is flexibly worded to enable 'reasonable expansion of established businesses' creates uncertainty.

Full text:

see attached letter

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.