Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Cannock Chase District Council search
New searchNo
Draft Local Plan Review
Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?
Representation ID: 1961
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Cannock Chase District Council
Support provision to meet Solihull's own housing needs.
Object to presenting 2,000 to meet HMA shortfall as a maximum.
HMA have not yet decided distribution of shortfall and Duty to Cooperate is on-going. No apparent mechanism for future flexibility, this is essential.
Such flexibility is obvious for employment growth agenda, including Policy P17 and Green Belt release.
Concern this will create unwelcome precedent and increase housing pressure in Zone of Influence surrounding the Cannock Chase SAC. Mitigation strategy underway.
see attached letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q23. Are there any other comments you wish to make on the Draft Local Plan?
Representation ID: 2613
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Cannock Chase District Council
Lack of HRA in evidence base.
see attached letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q20. Do you agree with the policies for quality of place? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 2614
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Cannock Chase District Council
Policy P17 - Paragraph 5.19.2 of the Sustainability Appraisal states that wording of Policy 17: Countryside and Green Belt is flexibly worded to enable 'reasonable expansion of established businesses' creates uncertainty.
see attached letter
