Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Cromwell & Duggins Lane Residents Association search
New searchNo
Draft Local Plan Review
01 Balsall Common - Barratt's Farm
Representation ID: 2713
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Cromwell & Duggins Lane Residents Association
We do not feel therefore that the housing numbers and locations at Barrat's Farm, Windmill Lane and Frog Lane are appropriate in size or location relative to the Meriden Gap and certainly don't comply with the NPPF concerning the protection of green belt land.
see attached letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q16. Do you believe we have identified the infrastructure[35] required to support these developments? If not why not? Are there any additional facilities you believe are required, if so what are the
Representation ID: 2714
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Cromwell & Duggins Lane Residents Association
Additional housing in Balsall Common will increase traffic heading east into Coventry towards Warwick University, A46 and business parks, and exacerbate already congested roads.
see attached letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
02 Balsall Common - Frog Lane
Representation ID: 4118
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Cromwell & Duggins Lane Residents Association
We do not feel therefore that the housing numbers and locations at Barrat's Farm, Windmill Lane and Frog Lane are appropriate in size or location relative to the Meriden Gap and certainly don't comply with the NPPF concerning the protection of green belt land.
see attached letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
03 Balsall Common - Windmill Lane/Kenilworth Road
Representation ID: 4119
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Cromwell & Duggins Lane Residents Association
We do not feel therefore that the housing numbers and locations at Barrat's Farm, Windmill Lane and Frog Lane are appropriate in size or location relative to the Meriden Gap and certainly don't comply with the NPPF concerning the protection of green belt land.
see attached letter
