Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Urban Growth Company search
New searchNo
Draft Local Plan Review
Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?
Representation ID: 3166
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Urban Growth Company
Agent: ARUP
The Hub Growth and Infrastructure Plan demonstrates a larger capacity for growth than is currently outlined in the Draft Local Plan. This would contribute towards the objectively assessed need of the Borough and the unmet need of the wider HMA.
The overall number of dwellings (1000) should be greater and the HGIP sets out a figure of at least 1500 homes over the plan period, rising to 3-4000 beyond 2032.
see attached letter and supporting document (The UK Central Hub Growth and Infrastructure Plan)
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q9. Do you agree with Policy P3? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 3167
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Urban Growth Company
Agent: ARUP
The policy does not establish specific employment requirements for the UKC Hub area. Whilst we are supportive of the principle of significant economic growth for The Hub within the plan period, it would be helpful to establish the required quantum of employment development required. Furthermore, it is unclear as to the level of required employment land for the Draft Plan as a whole, across the plan period. As such, we would suggest that this policy requires greater certainty on the amount and type of employment provision required along with related infrastructure.
see attached letter and supporting document (The UK Central Hub Growth and Infrastructure Plan)
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
19 Bickenhill - The Hub, UKC
Representation ID: 3174
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Urban Growth Company
Agent: ARUP
Support.
see attached letter and supporting document (The UK Central Hub Growth and Infrastructure Plan)
