Draft Local Plan Review

Search representations

Results for Historic England- West Midlands Region search

New search New search

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q3. Do you agree with the spatial strategy we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?

Representation ID: 261

Received: 12/01/2017

Respondent: Historic England- West Midlands Region

Representation Summary:

Strategic objectives fail to fully reflect that local plans must be prepared with the objective of contributing to the achievement of sustainable development. Strategic decisions should be made having regard to the great weight that needs to be applied to the protection and enhancement of the historic environment.
The limited number of 'Guiding Principles Generally in Support' fail to reflect this.
Pursuing sustainable development involves seeking positive improvements in the quality of the built, natural and historic environment.
The conservation of heritage assets should be seen as a positive place shaping principle/objective reflected in the plan to deliver sustainable development.

Full text:

see attached letter

No

Draft Local Plan Review

01 Balsall Common - Barratt's Farm

Representation ID: 1392

Received: 12/01/2017

Respondent: Historic England- West Midlands Region

Representation Summary:

Comment - Notes the site includes or is adjacent to listed building(s). Concerned that SMBC has failed to demonstrate that the Plan will be consistent with the national objective of achieving sustainable development; that evidence has been gathered and applied to indicate a positive strategy for the historic environment will be employed or that great weight has been given to the conservation of affected designated heritage assets and their setting in accordance with national policy and legislative provisions.

Full text:

see attached letter

No

Draft Local Plan Review

02 Balsall Common - Frog Lane

Representation ID: 1393

Received: 12/01/2017

Respondent: Historic England- West Midlands Region

Representation Summary:

Comment - Notes that the site includes and/or is adjacent to listed building(s). concerned that SMBC has failed to demonstrate that the Plan will be consistent with the national objective of achieving sustainable development; that evidence has been gathered and applied to indicate a positive strategy for the historic environment will be employed or that great weight has been given to the conservation of affected designated heritage assets and their setting in accordance with national policy and legislative provisions.

Full text:

see attached letter

No

Draft Local Plan Review

03 Balsall Common - Windmill Lane/Kenilworth Road

Representation ID: 1394

Received: 12/01/2017

Respondent: Historic England- West Midlands Region

Representation Summary:

Comment - Notes that the site includes and/or is adjacent to listed building(s). Concerned that SMBC has failed to demonstrate that the Plan will be consistent with the national objective of achieving sustainable development; that evidence has been gathered and applied to indicate a positive strategy for the historic environment will be employed or that great weight has been given to the conservation of affected designated heritage assets and their setting in accordance with national policy and legislative provisions.

Full text:

see attached letter

No

Draft Local Plan Review

12 Shirley - South of Dog Kennel Lane

Representation ID: 1395

Received: 12/01/2017

Respondent: Historic England- West Midlands Region

Representation Summary:

Comment - Notes that the site includes and/or is adjacent to listed building(s). Concerned that SMBC has failed to demonstrate that the Plan will be consistent with the national objective of achieving sustainable development; that evidence has been gathered and applied to indicate a positive strategy for the historic environment will be employed or that great weight has been given to the conservation of affected designated heritage assets and their setting in accordance with national policy and legislative provisions.

Full text:

see attached letter

No

Draft Local Plan Review

13 Shirley - South of Shirley

Representation ID: 1396

Received: 12/01/2017

Respondent: Historic England- West Midlands Region

Representation Summary:

Comment - Notes that the site includes and/or is adjacent to listed building(s). Concerned that SMBC has failed to demonstrate that the Plan will be consistent with the national objective of achieving sustainable development; that evidence has been gathered and applied to indicate a positive strategy for the historic environment will be employed or that great weight has been given to the conservation of affected designated heritage assets and their setting in accordance with national policy and legislative provisions.

Full text:

see attached letter

No

Draft Local Plan Review

08 Knowle - Hampton Road

Representation ID: 1397

Received: 12/01/2017

Respondent: Historic England- West Midlands Region

Representation Summary:

Comment - Notes that the site includes and/or is adjacent to listed building(s). Concerned that SMBC has failed to demonstrate that the Plan will be consistent with the national objective of achieving sustainable development; that evidence has been gathered and applied to indicate a positive strategy for the historic environment will be employed or that great weight has been given to the conservation of affected designated heritage assets and their setting in accordance with national policy and legislative provisions.

Full text:

see attached letter

No

Draft Local Plan Review

09 Knowle - South of Knowle

Representation ID: 1398

Received: 12/01/2017

Respondent: Historic England- West Midlands Region

Representation Summary:

Comment - Notes that the site includes and/or is adjacent to listed building(s). Concerned that SMBC has failed to demonstrate that the Plan will be consistent with the national objective of achieving sustainable development; that evidence has been gathered and applied to indicate a positive strategy for the historic environment will be employed or that great weight has been given to the conservation of affected designated heritage assets and their setting in accordance with national policy and legislative provisions.

Full text:

see attached letter

No

Draft Local Plan Review

16 Solihull - East of Solihull

Representation ID: 1399

Received: 12/01/2017

Respondent: Historic England- West Midlands Region

Representation Summary:

Comment - Notes that the site includes and/or is adjacent to listed building(s). Concerned that SMBC has failed to demonstrate that the Plan will be consistent with the national objective of achieving sustainable development; that evidence has been gathered and applied to indicate a positive strategy for the historic environment will be employed or that great weight has been given to the conservation of affected designated heritage assets and their setting in accordance with national policy and legislative provisions.

Full text:

see attached letter

No

Draft Local Plan Review

19 Bickenhill - The Hub, UKC

Representation ID: 1400

Received: 12/01/2017

Respondent: Historic England- West Midlands Region

Representation Summary:

Comment - Notes that the site includes and/or is adjacent to listed building(s). Concerned that SMBC has failed to demonstrate that the Plan will be consistent with the national objective of achieving sustainable development; that evidence has been gathered and applied to indicate a positive strategy for the historic environment will be employed or that great weight has been given to the conservation of affected designated heritage assets and their setting in accordance with national policy and legislative provisions.

Full text:

see attached letter

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.