Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane search
New searchNo
Draft Local Plan Review
Alternative Site Suggested (Call for Sites)
Representation ID: 4843
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
(SHELAA sites 104, 135, 241) - Limited constraints, bus stops located conveniently, railway station close by. Moderately performing Green Belt. There are more neutral and positive effects than negative and potential for the site to deliver additional housing.
see attached documents
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Alternative Site Suggested (Call for Sites)
Representation ID: 4844
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
SHELAA site 106 - the site can be developed for up to 55 new homes in a sustainable manner. The proposals will provide a strong defensible Green Belt barrier and would help to integrate the built form into the landscape and soften the transition from open countryside to built urban form that currently exists at the edge of the village. Development of this site would be less harmful to the Green Belt than the proposed allocation at P016, and is more responsive to its setting.
see attached documents
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Alternative Site Suggested (Call for Sites)
Representation ID: 4845
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
SHELAA site 107 - Disagree with the SA assessment of the site. It is located in an excellent position, close to the edge of Solihull town centre, and junction 5 of the M42, and within walking distance of many bus stops serving various routes. It relates much more closely to the adjoining built development than to the open countryside. Impacts on the Green Belt would be minimal; M42 and A41 already serve as an effective, physical barrier to the extension of the Green Belt. Its development would greatly assist the Council to meet the needs of housing within the HMA.
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q16. Do you believe we have identified the infrastructure[35] required to support these developments? If not why not? Are there any additional facilities you believe are required, if so what are the
Representation ID: 4846
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
Believe that the infrastructure identified to support the proposed allocations are correct- funding from CIL or S106 contributions will assist the council in providing the right infrastructure to meet the needs resulting from new development.
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q18. Do you agree with the policies for improving accessibility and encouraging sustainable travel? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4847
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
The policies will enable the steering of new developments to most appropriate, accessible locations to reduce the reliance on the private car and to encourage the take up of new sustainable modes of travel thereby not materially adding to the existing highway congestion. It agrees with the Council that the Policies can influence road safety through its control or influence on the design of new development and manage the demand for travel.
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q19. Do you agree with the policies for protecting the environment? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4848
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
The policies are consistent with advice within the National Planning Framework and subject to the measures required by each of the proposed policies not having an adverse impact on viability, the policies would appear to be acceptable.
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q20. Do you agree with the policies for quality of place? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4849
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
The policies are consistent with the NPPF.
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q21. Do you agree with the policies health and supporting communities? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4850
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
Generally support the policies as they are consistent with the NPPF.
see attached documents