Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Jaguar Land Rover search
New searchYes
Draft Local Plan Review
20 Bickenhill - JLR extension
Representation ID: 3680
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover
Agent: Mr Neil Tiley
EMPLOYMENT (NOT HOUSING).
Allocation of land at Damson Parkway is in the right location owing to its relationship with the existing JLR Solihull plant.
Insufficient space at existing plant to accommodate a logistics operation centre of sufficient size to meet business requirements of JLR.
Will prevent the need for parts and components to be driven to of-site storage facilities.
Policy needs to remain flexible.
see JLR letter via agent
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q1. Do you agree that we've identified the right challenges facing the Borough? If not why not? Are there any additional challenges that should be addressed?
Representation ID: 5308
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover
Agent: Mr Neil Tiley
Broadly welcome Challenges and Objectives.
Should set out commitment to need to continually review the Local Plan to accord with national guidance.
Challenge D - be more positive; set challenge of actively improving economic role of Borough, not just maintaining it.
Actively address managing congestion through infrastructure planning and investment.
Challenge F - Currently studying provision of PV panels on roof of proposed Logistics Operations Centre.
Challenge H - require permissive policies to support economic growth of employers such as JLR.
Challenge N - HS2 construction works may have significant adverse effects on efficient operation of highways network.
see JLR letter via agent
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q2. Do you agree with the Borough Vision we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 5310
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover
Agent: Mr Neil Tiley
Broadly support.
Vision Overview solely focused on opportunities and economic growth provided by HS2.
Should also recognise economic growth independent of HS2, e.g. JLR.
Does not recognise infrastructure needs which should be addressed to support such businesses, including connecting suppliers, operations and markets.
Welcome reference to JLR in Paragraphs 72 to 87. Should also reference relationship with Fen End site close to Borough boundary.
see JLR letter via agent
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q3. Do you agree with the spatial strategy we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 5311
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover
Agent: Mr Neil Tiley
Brownfield-first approach in spatial strategy is contrary to NPPF; which supports the review of Green Belt where required to promote sustainable patterns of development.
Also contrary to Policy P7 which seeks to focus development in most accessible locations.
Limits necessary flexibility required to respond to business needs in most appropriate locations. Should delete this paragraph.
Guiding principles which support delivery of UK Central Masterplan, including JLR, are consistent with NPPF. However, ignores release of Green Belt to support businesses other than HS2.
Growth ambitions of JLR are supported in Policy P1 and need to be added to Paragraph 104.
see JLR letter via agent
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q4. Do you agree with Policy P1? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 5312
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover
Agent: Mr Neil Tiley
Strongly welcome Policy P1. Welcome correct identification of exceptional circumstances which warrant Green Belt release at Damson Parkway.
see JLR letter via agent
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q5. Do you agree with the key objectives that development is expected to meet as identified in Policy P1 are appropriate? If not why not? Are there any others you think should be included?
Representation ID: 5313
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover
Agent: Mr Neil Tiley
Welcome policy support provided by Policy P1. However, the objectives would be addressed at planning application stage; a number of which are insufficiently clear and/or appear onerous.
Clarify terms 'growth' and 'place-making'.
E.g. economic development proposals evidently support economic growth. Place-making usually refers to mixed use developments. Unclear how employment-led proposal would support strong, vibrant and healthy communities.
see JLR letter via agent
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q9. Do you agree with Policy P3? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 5315
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover
Agent: Mr Neil Tiley
Welcome Policy P3.
Criteria are broadly appropriate but would benefit from making specific reference to the need to demonstrate that the loss of employment sites would not have adverse impacts upon regionally and nationally significant employers.
see JLR letter via agent
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q10. Do you believe the right scale and location of development has been identified? If not why not?
Representation ID: 5316
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover
Agent: Mr Neil Tiley
Allocation of land at Damson Parkway is in the right location owing to its relationship with the existing JLR Solihull plant.
Insufficient space at existing plant to accommodate a logistics operation centre of sufficient size to meet business requirements of JLR.
Will prevent the need for parts and components to be driven to of-site storage facilities.
Policy needs to remain flexible.
see JLR letter via agent
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q16. Do you believe we have identified the infrastructure[35] required to support these developments? If not why not? Are there any additional facilities you believe are required, if so what are the
Representation ID: 5317
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover
Agent: Mr Neil Tiley
EMPLOYMENT (not housing).
Industrial Strategy Green Paper (Jan 2017) identifies significant role the automotive sector plays in UK economic growth, and challenges posed by lack of infrastructure.
Appendix C of DLP does not include a strategic infrastructure plan.
Transport Assessment of new allocations and HS2 impact on the Borough should be a priority.
No mention of potential Highways England M42 J6 options in DLP; needs to be included.
Link road from M42 and/or branch line from East (sic) Coast Mainline would be beneficial to UKC Hub.
Strategic Infrastructure planning for transport, energy resilience and digital communications need to be addressed.
see JLR letter via agent
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q18. Do you agree with the policies for improving accessibility and encouraging sustainable travel? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 5318
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover
Agent: Mr Neil Tiley
No policy providing approach to determining proposals for new transport infrastructure.
Should take positive approach to proposals which address Challenge H by diverting traffic from congested routes and providing alternative modes of transport.
Policies do not identify or promote any of the transport improvements necessary to address existing and future issues.
Policy P7 should be revised to refer to SPRINT, METRO etc as well.
Policy P7 does not refer to where employment developments should be located.
Welcome provisions in Policy P8.
METRO and SPRINT schemes should take account of potential for adverse effects on existing businesses and residents e.g. JLR.
see JLR letter via agent