Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Elta Estates search
New searchNo
Draft Local Plan Review
02 Balsall Common - Frog Lane
Representation ID: 308
Received: 16/01/2017
Respondent: Elta Estates
Object, as will result in a change to the Green Belt boundary, loss of local playing fields and allotments, increased traffic using the road network which is already overloaded and congested, compounded by impact of new Jaguar Land Rover facility, and future highway safety issues. Should consider more suitable brownfield sites in north of village close to local amenities, rail and road main networks which would not impact on current residents of the village.
see attached letter received by email
original letter superseded by amended version that included tenancy address
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q15. Do you believe we are planning to build new homes in the right locations? If not why not, and which locations do you believe shouldn't be included? Are there any other locations that you think
Representation ID: 1773
Received: 16/01/2017
Respondent: Elta Estates
Why are more suitable brownfield sites to the north of Balsall Common, and other parts of the Solihull Borough such as Dorridge and areas closer to NEC and Airport not being considered?
see attached letter received by email
original letter superseded by amended version that included tenancy address
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q16. Do you believe we have identified the infrastructure[35] required to support these developments? If not why not? Are there any additional facilities you believe are required, if so what are the
Representation ID: 2251
Received: 16/01/2017
Respondent: Elta Estates
Highway infrastructure in Holly Lane and Gipsy Lane and surrounding roads cannot handle extra traffic associated with housing site 2
see attached letter received by email
original letter superseded by amended version that included tenancy address
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q21. Do you agree with the policies health and supporting communities? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 2252
Received: 16/01/2017
Respondent: Elta Estates
Local playing fields and allotments threatened with removal for housing site 2 should be protected, and additional local amenities planned for extra housing
see attached letter received by email
original letter superseded by amended version that included tenancy address
