Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for West Midlands HARP Consortium search
New searchNo
Draft Local Plan Review
Q11. Do you agree with Policy P4? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 1955
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: West Midlands HARP Consortium
Agent: Tetlow King Planning
Policy 4a - amend definition of affordable housing to align with NPPF.
Policy 4b - allow delivery of affordable housing through cross-subsidy where it can be demonstrated that affordable housing development cannot be achieved without an element of open market housing. Economic circumstances and reductions in Government subsidy have significantly reduced viability of 100% affordable housing developments.
Remove reference for need of community support as often local objection.
see response from agent
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q12. Do you agree with the level of affordable housing being sought in Policy P4? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 1956
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: West Midlands HARP Consortium
Agent: Tetlow King Planning
Concerned that income to be spent on rent is set at 35%. Should be 25%, or 386 dwellings per year.
see response from agent
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q23. Are there any other comments you wish to make on the Draft Local Plan?
Representation ID: 2600
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: West Midlands HARP Consortium
Agent: Tetlow King Planning
Welcome SHMA.
Welcome non-inclusion of private rented sector in affordable housing need.
Concerned that income to be spent on rent is set at 35%. Should be 25%, or 386 dwellings per year.
see response from agent
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q20. Do you agree with the policies for quality of place? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 2601
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: West Midlands HARP Consortium
Agent: Tetlow King Planning
Policy P15 - fourth bullet point should be removed as it is unnecessary. All housing development has to meet Approved Document M of the Building Regulations as a mandatory requirement.
New optional standards include a higher standard of Approved Document M of the Building Regulations under M(2) and M(3).
Have to demonstrate a "clear need" for the introduction of the optional technical standards. Should consider the impact of using these standards as part of Local Plan viability assessment.
see response from agent
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q20. Do you agree with the policies for quality of place? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 2602
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: West Midlands HARP Consortium
Agent: Tetlow King Planning
Policy P17 - Whilst Policy P4(B) sets out that rural exception schemes in the Green Belt can be considered acceptable in certain situations, it would be good practice to also include reference to Paragraph 89 of the NPPF under Policy P17 to avoid any doubt that the Local Plan is in accordance with the NPPF.
see response from agent