Draft Local Plan Review

Search representations

Results for McLean Estates Limited search

New search New search

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Alternative Site Suggested (Call for Sites)

Representation ID: 2196

Received: 15/02/2017

Respondent: McLean Estates Limited

Agent: Richard Cobb Planning

Representation Summary:

Suggest allocation of sites 86 and 96. They are small / medium site which taken with others could better and faster achieve the Council's housing requirement.
Site 86 is degraded land and a brownfield site. It is sufficiently contained to have far lass impact on the Green Belt than Site allocation 6.
Site 96 - in broad terms there is nothing to choose between extending the Solihull urban area eastwards in this sector to Field Lane, or Catherine-de-Barnes westwards to Field Lane.

Full text:

see letter from agent

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q15. Do you believe we are planning to build new homes in the right locations? If not why not, and which locations do you believe shouldn't be included? Are there any other locations that you think

Representation ID: 3401

Received: 15/02/2017

Respondent: McLean Estates Limited

Agent: Richard Cobb Planning

Representation Summary:

There are 2 major faults with the way in which new housing is proposed and located:
1) concentration an a small number of large housing sites instead of a range of different sized sites.
2) disproportionate amount of additional housing proposed in the Local Plan Review is proposed to be located in Blythe Ward - Parishes of Dickens Heath and Cheswick Green. 45% of all the proposed additional housing would be sited in these two parishes.

Full text:

see letter from agent

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q3. Do you agree with the spatial strategy we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?

Representation ID: 3402

Received: 15/02/2017

Respondent: McLean Estates Limited

Agent: Richard Cobb Planning

Representation Summary:

There are 2 major faults with the way in which new housing is proposed and located: 1) concentration an a small number of large housing sites instead of a range of different sized sites.
2) disproportionate amount of additional housing proposed in the Local Plan Review is proposed to be located in Blythe Ward - Parishes of Dickens Heath and Cheswick Green. 45% of all the proposed additional housing would be sited in these two parishes.

Full text:

see letter from agent

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?

Representation ID: 3403

Received: 15/02/2017

Respondent: McLean Estates Limited

Agent: Richard Cobb Planning

Representation Summary:

The Council has put forward a reasonable case for the housing numbers proposed but it still falls short of what should be provided in Solihull in terms of meeting the Objectively Assessed Housing Need requirement for the Birmingham HMA. Most of site allocations are large sites but the Council is relying too much on volume house builders to deliver. The Housing White Paper highlights the need to release more small and medium sized sites.

Full text:

see letter from agent

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.