Draft Local Plan Review

Search representations

Results for Real Christmas Trees Ltd search

New search New search

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q15. Do you believe we are planning to build new homes in the right locations? If not why not, and which locations do you believe shouldn't be included? Are there any other locations that you think

Representation ID: 1231

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Real Christmas Trees Ltd

Agent: DLP Consultants

Representation Summary:

Object- it is considered that a number of the proposed housing sites are unsuitable and will be difficult to deliver due to, for example, the need to properly replace existing sports facilities. This applies to Sites PHA 4 and PHA 18; other sites are also constrained in terms of delivery. It is proposed site PHA 13 should be extended to include land to the west (this is the subject of a detailed submission accompanied by a full suite of supporting studies) to provide the necessary certainty of delivery of housing over the initial phrases of the plan period.

Full text:

Object- it is considered that a number of the proposed housing sites are unsuitable and will be difficult to deliver due to, for example, the need to properly replace existing sports facilities. This applies to Sites PHA 4 and PHA 18; other sites are also constrained in terms of delivery. It is proposed site PHA 13 should be extended to include land to the west (this is the subject of a detailed submission accompanied by a full suite of supporting studies) to provide the necessary certainty of delivery of housing over the initial phrases of the plan period.

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?

Representation ID: 1273

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Real Christmas Trees Ltd

Agent: DLP Consultants

Representation Summary:

The figure of 2000 houses does not properly reflect the quantum of housing likely to be required to be provided within Solihull to meet needs arising from the two adjacent HMAs. Before these housing figures are confirmed Solihull should adopt an approach such as that applied by North Warwickshire Council- when a higher figure has been used for the purpose of the Local Plan Review. It is considered that a figure of at least 4000 houses should be applied.

Full text:

Object to the total number of housing that Solihull will be taking from the HMA.

(See attached representation)

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?

Representation ID: 2573

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Real Christmas Trees Ltd

Agent: DLP Consultants

Representation Summary:

The figure of 2000 houses does not properly reflect the quantum of housing likely to be required to be provided within Solihull to meet needs arising from the two adjacent HMAs. Before these housing figures are confirmed Solihull should adopt an approach such as that applied by North Warwickshire Council- when a higher figure has been used for the purpose of the Local Plan Review. It is considered that a figure of at least 4000 houses should be applied.

Full text:

see additional documents to support online submission

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Alternative Site Suggested (Call for Sites)

Representation ID: 2574

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Real Christmas Trees Ltd

Agent: DLP Consultants

Representation Summary:

proposed land at Woods Farm Bills Lane Shirley

Full text:

see additional documents to support online submission

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.