Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Sport England search
New searchYes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q1. Do you agree that we've identified the right challenges facing the Borough? If not why not? Are there any additional challenges that should be addressed?
Representation ID: 3047
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Sport England
Support the identification of Challenges H, J and K.
These challenges are consistent with Government planning policy (section 8 of the NPPF) on creating healthy communities and are consistent with Sport England's current strategy 'Towards an Active Nation'.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
04 Dickens Heath - West of Dickens Heath
Representation ID: 3048
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Sport England
Sport England are aware that work is currently underway on the completion of an up-to-date Playing Pitch Strateg(PPS).
The PPS should be used to determine whether or not the playing fields proposed for allocation is surplus to sporting requirements by demonstrating that there is an excess of playing fields in the catchment.
If this cannot be demonstrated then the playing field or formal recreation land would need to be replaced with equivalent or better in terms of quantity and quality.
In the absence of evidence to justify the loss of sporting facilities, Sport England object.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
08 Knowle - Hampton Road
Representation ID: 3049
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Sport England
Sport England are aware that work is currently underway on the completion of an up-to-date Playing Pitch Strateg(PPS).
The PPS should be used to determine whether or not the playing fields proposed for allocation is surplus to sporting requirements by demonstrating that there is an excess of playing fields in the catchment.
If this cannot be demonstrated then the playing field or formal recreation land would need to be replaced with equivalent or better in terms of quantity and quality.
In the absence of evidence to justify the loss of sporting facilities, Sport England object.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
15 Smith's Wood - Jenson House/Auckland Drive
Representation ID: 3050
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Sport England
Sport England are aware that work is currently underway on the completion of an up-to-date Playing Pitch Strateg(PPS).
The PPS should be used to determine whether or not the playing fields proposed for allocation is surplus to sporting requirements by demonstrating that there is an excess of playing fields in the catchment.
If this cannot be demonstrated then the playing field or formal recreation land would need to be replaced with equivalent or better in terms of quantity and quality.
In the absence of evidence to justify the loss of sporting facilities, Sport England object.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
16 Solihull - East of Solihull
Representation ID: 3051
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Sport England
Sport England are aware that work is currently underway on the completion of an up-to-date Playing Pitch Strateg(PPS).
The PPS should be used to determine whether or not the playing fields proposed for allocation is surplus to sporting requirements by demonstrating that there is an excess of playing fields in the catchment.
If this cannot be demonstrated then the playing field or formal recreation land would need to be replaced with equivalent or better in terms of quantity and quality.
In the absence of evidence to justify the loss of sporting facilities, Sport England object.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
18 Solihull - Sharmans Cross Road
Representation ID: 3052
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Sport England
Sport England are aware that work is currently underway on the completion of an up-to-date Playing Pitch Strateg(PPS).
The PPS should be used to determine whether or not the playing fields proposed for allocation is surplus to sporting requirements by demonstrating that there is an excess of playing fields in the catchment.
If this cannot be demonstrated then the playing field or formal recreation land would need to be replaced with equivalent or better in terms of quantity and quality.
In the absence of evidence to justify the loss of sporting facilities, Sport England object.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q20. Do you agree with the policies for quality of place? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 3395
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Sport England
Sport England, in conjunction with Public Health England, has produced 'Active Design' (October 2015), a guide to planning new developments that create the right environment to help people get more active, more often in the interests of health and wellbeing. We would commend the use of the guidance in the master planning process for new residential developments.
We seek to ensure that Active design is utilised in the determination of planning applications and is embedded in Planning Policy P15 in order to influence the design and promote healthy communities and active lifestyles.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q21. Do you agree with the policies health and supporting communities? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 3396
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Sport England
Policy P18 - Support is offered for the principle that provides support for proposals which encourage healthy and active lifestyles. This is consistent with Government planning policy (section 8 of the NPPF) on creating healthy communities and consistent with Sport England's current strategy 'Towards an Active Nation'.
The use of Health Impact Assessments for larger developments is welcomed as these can help ensure that developments give appropriate consideration to how environments can be created which allow healthy and active lifestyles to take place.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q21. Do you agree with the policies health and supporting communities? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 3399
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Sport England
Policy P20 -
Support protection and provision of sports facilities - does this include playing fields?
Should be more specific on evidence required to demonstrate any sports facilities/playing fields are surplus to requirements.
Would only accept a robust, up-to-date strategic assessment.
Object to loss of playing fields and other sporting facilities where there is a substantial community benefit. Does not accord with Para. 74. Unclear what this involves.
Part B should reference the emerging Playing Pitch Strategy as the evidence base.
Seek to ensure that new development meets any new sports facility needs arising as a result of the development.