Draft Local Plan Review

Search representations

Results for Sport England search

New search New search

Yes

Draft Local Plan Review

Q1. Do you agree that we've identified the right challenges facing the Borough? If not why not? Are there any additional challenges that should be addressed?

Representation ID: 3047

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Sport England

Representation Summary:

Support the identification of Challenges H, J and K.
These challenges are consistent with Government planning policy (section 8 of the NPPF) on creating healthy communities and are consistent with Sport England's current strategy 'Towards an Active Nation'.

No

Draft Local Plan Review

04 Dickens Heath - West of Dickens Heath

Representation ID: 3048

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Sport England

Representation Summary:

Sport England are aware that work is currently underway on the completion of an up-to-date Playing Pitch Strateg(PPS).
The PPS should be used to determine whether or not the playing fields proposed for allocation is surplus to sporting requirements by demonstrating that there is an excess of playing fields in the catchment.
If this cannot be demonstrated then the playing field or formal recreation land would need to be replaced with equivalent or better in terms of quantity and quality.
In the absence of evidence to justify the loss of sporting facilities, Sport England object.

No

Draft Local Plan Review

08 Knowle - Hampton Road

Representation ID: 3049

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Sport England

Representation Summary:

Sport England are aware that work is currently underway on the completion of an up-to-date Playing Pitch Strateg(PPS).
The PPS should be used to determine whether or not the playing fields proposed for allocation is surplus to sporting requirements by demonstrating that there is an excess of playing fields in the catchment.
If this cannot be demonstrated then the playing field or formal recreation land would need to be replaced with equivalent or better in terms of quantity and quality.
In the absence of evidence to justify the loss of sporting facilities, Sport England object.

No

Draft Local Plan Review

15 Smith's Wood - Jenson House/Auckland Drive

Representation ID: 3050

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Sport England

Representation Summary:

Sport England are aware that work is currently underway on the completion of an up-to-date Playing Pitch Strateg(PPS).
The PPS should be used to determine whether or not the playing fields proposed for allocation is surplus to sporting requirements by demonstrating that there is an excess of playing fields in the catchment.
If this cannot be demonstrated then the playing field or formal recreation land would need to be replaced with equivalent or better in terms of quantity and quality.
In the absence of evidence to justify the loss of sporting facilities, Sport England object.

No

Draft Local Plan Review

16 Solihull - East of Solihull

Representation ID: 3051

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Sport England

Representation Summary:

Sport England are aware that work is currently underway on the completion of an up-to-date Playing Pitch Strateg(PPS).
The PPS should be used to determine whether or not the playing fields proposed for allocation is surplus to sporting requirements by demonstrating that there is an excess of playing fields in the catchment.
If this cannot be demonstrated then the playing field or formal recreation land would need to be replaced with equivalent or better in terms of quantity and quality.
In the absence of evidence to justify the loss of sporting facilities, Sport England object.

No

Draft Local Plan Review

18 Solihull - Sharmans Cross Road

Representation ID: 3052

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Sport England

Representation Summary:

Sport England are aware that work is currently underway on the completion of an up-to-date Playing Pitch Strateg(PPS).
The PPS should be used to determine whether or not the playing fields proposed for allocation is surplus to sporting requirements by demonstrating that there is an excess of playing fields in the catchment.
If this cannot be demonstrated then the playing field or formal recreation land would need to be replaced with equivalent or better in terms of quantity and quality.
In the absence of evidence to justify the loss of sporting facilities, Sport England object.

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q20. Do you agree with the policies for quality of place? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?

Representation ID: 3395

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Sport England

Representation Summary:

Sport England, in conjunction with Public Health England, has produced 'Active Design' (October 2015), a guide to planning new developments that create the right environment to help people get more active, more often in the interests of health and wellbeing. We would commend the use of the guidance in the master planning process for new residential developments.
We seek to ensure that Active design is utilised in the determination of planning applications and is embedded in Planning Policy P15 in order to influence the design and promote healthy communities and active lifestyles.

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q21. Do you agree with the policies health and supporting communities? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?

Representation ID: 3396

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Sport England

Representation Summary:

Policy P18 - Support is offered for the principle that provides support for proposals which encourage healthy and active lifestyles. This is consistent with Government planning policy (section 8 of the NPPF) on creating healthy communities and consistent with Sport England's current strategy 'Towards an Active Nation'.

The use of Health Impact Assessments for larger developments is welcomed as these can help ensure that developments give appropriate consideration to how environments can be created which allow healthy and active lifestyles to take place.

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q21. Do you agree with the policies health and supporting communities? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?

Representation ID: 3399

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Sport England

Representation Summary:

Policy P20 -
Support protection and provision of sports facilities - does this include playing fields?
Should be more specific on evidence required to demonstrate any sports facilities/playing fields are surplus to requirements.
Would only accept a robust, up-to-date strategic assessment.
Object to loss of playing fields and other sporting facilities where there is a substantial community benefit. Does not accord with Para. 74. Unclear what this involves.
Part B should reference the emerging Playing Pitch Strategy as the evidence base.
Seek to ensure that new development meets any new sports facility needs arising as a result of the development.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.