Draft Local Plan Review

Search representations

Results for Lioncourt Strategic Land search

New search New search

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q3. Do you agree with the spatial strategy we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?

Representation ID: 3500

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Lioncourt Strategic Land

Agent: Avison Young

Representation Summary:

Broadly agree. However, fails to acknowledge growth opportunity at Tidbury Green.
Proposed amendment - Addition of a red "Locations and directions of growth in the rural area" arrow on the east side of Tidbury Green to be added to the "Spatial Strategy Key Diagram".

Full text:

see attached

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?

Representation ID: 4934

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Lioncourt Strategic Land

Agent: Avison Young

Representation Summary:

OAN calculation inadequately reflects the significant employment growth/job creation that is expected to occur in the Borough during plan period.
Additional housing proposed to meet the HMA shortfall is insufficient. Does not reflect significance of Solihull as location of employment growth.
Policy P5 should be amended to read:
Allocate land for 25,023 dwellings, or at least 1,317 p.a.
Council accommodate 36% of 37,900 shortfall across HMA.
25,023 is full OAN for the Borough, including justifiable contribution to HMA shortfall.
Summary table of allocated sites and Appendix C should be amended to include land at Tidbury Green Farm.

Full text:

see attached

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q15. Do you believe we are planning to build new homes in the right locations? If not why not, and which locations do you believe shouldn't be included? Are there any other locations that you think

Representation ID: 4935

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Lioncourt Strategic Land

Agent: Avison Young

Representation Summary:

Insufficient land allocated. Need to release more Green Belt land.
Proposed amendment - Additional Green Belt land should be released. Such land should be located within sustainable locations, including land to the east of Tidbury Green.

Land at Tidbury Green Farm should be included in the list of proposal allocations.

Full text:

see attached

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q23. Are there any other comments you wish to make on the Draft Local Plan?

Representation ID: 4936

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Lioncourt Strategic Land

Agent: Avison Young

Representation Summary:

GVA - OAN for Solihull on behalf of Lioncourt Strategic Land

Broadly agree with following in SHMA:
* 2014 household projections are demographic starting point.
* 10% market uplift
* Vacancy Rate (2.3%)
* 62dpa for 2011-2014 shortfall

Disagree with SHMA and recommend following:
* Experian model too constrained. Cambridge Econometrics unconstrained model preferred. Additional economic needs uplift required.
* HMA contribution should be based on % HMA employment growth or commuting links with Birmingham.
* Housing requirement range from 914 to 1317dpa.

Full text:

see attached

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.