solihull.gov.uk

Draft Local Plan Review

Back to document

Search representations

Results for Ms D Spavin & Mr S Milner search

New search

Yes

Draft Local Plan Review

Q1. Do you agree that we've identified the right challenges facing the Borough? If not why not? Are there any additional challenges that should be addressed?

Representation ID: 1788

Received: 10/02/2017

Respondent: Ms D Spavin & Mr S Milner

Agent: Nigel Gough Associates

Representation Summary:

support the release of green belt land for employment uses.

Full text:

see attached letter re: site 20 employment land

Yes

Draft Local Plan Review

Q3. Do you agree with the spatial strategy we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?

Representation ID: 1789

Received: 10/02/2017

Respondent: Ms D Spavin & Mr S Milner

Agent: Nigel Gough Associates

Representation Summary:

support the spatial strategy and the allocation of employment land in the area, but would like to see a balanced approach to large and small businesses.

Full text:

see attached letter re: site 20 employment land

Yes

Draft Local Plan Review

Q10. Do you believe the right scale and location of development has been identified? If not why not?

Representation ID: 1790

Received: 10/02/2017

Respondent: Ms D Spavin & Mr S Milner

Agent: Nigel Gough Associates

Representation Summary:

logical and economically justified location for employment given proximity to JLR and BAirport.

Full text:

see attached letter re: site 20 employment land

Yes

Draft Local Plan Review

Q5. Do you agree with the key objectives that development is expected to meet as identified in Policy P1 are appropriate? If not why not? Are there any others you think should be included?

Representation ID: 2706

Received: 10/02/2017

Respondent: Ms D Spavin & Mr S Milner

Agent: Nigel Gough Associates

Representation Summary:

support the objectives of P1

Full text:

see attached letter re: site 20 employment land

Yes

Draft Local Plan Review

Q2. Do you agree with the Borough Vision we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?

Representation ID: 2709

Received: 10/02/2017

Respondent: Ms D Spavin & Mr S Milner

Agent: Nigel Gough Associates

Representation Summary:

agree with the vision, but have some concerns that smaller employment businesses in the area may be at a disadvantage.

Full text:

see attached letter re: site 20 employment land

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.