Draft Local Plan Review

Search representations

Results for Terra Strategic search

New search New search

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q3. Do you agree with the spatial strategy we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?

Representation ID: 2051

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Terra Strategic

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

Broadly agree with distribution strategy, but fails to address scale of housing growth required.
Housing should be increased and additional growth allocated to the rural villages and settlements within the Borough.

Full text:

see letter and supporting statement

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q11. Do you agree with Policy P4? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?

Representation ID: 2052

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Terra Strategic

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

50% affordable housing requirement too high, and much higher than other authorities in West Midlands.
Could negatively impact housing delivery.
Viability not yet been tested.

Full text:

see letter and supporting statement

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q12. Do you agree with the level of affordable housing being sought in Policy P4? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?

Representation ID: 2053

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Terra Strategic

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

50% affordable housing requirement too high, and much higher than other authorities in West Midlands.
Could negatively impact housing delivery.
Viability not yet been tested.

Full text:

see letter and supporting statement

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?

Representation ID: 2054

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Terra Strategic

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

We consider that the Solihull Local Plan Review should seek to accommodate a significantly larger proportion of Birmingham's shortfall than 5% of 37,900.
This is due to Solihull's proximity to the city, extensive
shared boundary, established travel-to-work patterns and complementary nature of housing and employment provision.
Edge of the conurbation offers the most obvious and sustainable option to meet Birmingham's shortfall.
Solihull not meeting HMA responsibilities.

Full text:

see letter and supporting statement

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Alternative Site Suggested (Call for Sites)

Representation ID: 2055

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Terra Strategic

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

SHELAA Site 81 - Land at Fillongley Road.
Can provide 100 homes
Easy walking distance to centre of Meriden village and primary school.
Well contained site.
Limited ecological or landscape interest.
Long term defensible Green Belt boundaries
Available and deliverable.
No technical or land ownership constraints.
Sustainable location for new housing.

Full text:

see letter and supporting statement

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q15. Do you believe we are planning to build new homes in the right locations? If not why not, and which locations do you believe shouldn't be included? Are there any other locations that you think

Representation ID: 3300

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Terra Strategic

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

More housing sites are required to contribute to HMA shortfall.
Site at Fillongley Road would contribute ca. 100 more homes.

Full text:

see letter and supporting statement

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.