Draft Local Plan Review

No

Representation ID: 2920

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Belle Homes Ltd

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

There is no defensible Green Belt Boundary. It represents a significant extension to Shirley's urban area reducing the green belt gap between the settlements of Shirley, Cheswick Green, Dickens Heath, Majors Green and Whitlock's End.
The proposed scale of development on sites 4, 11, 12 and 13
represents an over-concentration of growth in a small area which will cause the
coalescence of settlements and have a significant and potentially unacceptable
adverse impact on the existing communities and infrastructure as well as the
Green Belt and landscape.

No

Representation ID: 2929

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Belle Homes Ltd

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Would have a significant impact on the purposes of including land within the Green Belt, on Landscape Character, heritage assets and recreation facilities.
The proposed allocations will represent an over-concentration of growth in Knowle which will have an unacceptable adverse impact on the existing community and infrastructure. Would question how a population growth proposed by the allocations will satisfactorily assimilate into the village.

No

Representation ID: 2930

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Belle Homes Ltd

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Would have a significant impact on the purposes of including land within the Green Belt, on Landscape Character, heritage assets and recreation facilities.
The proposed allocations will represent an over-concentration of growth in Knowle which will have an unacceptable adverse impact on the existing community and infrastructure. Would question how a population growth proposed by the allocations will satisfactorily assimilate into the village.
Arden Academy has undergone a significant number of upgrades and extensions to existing facilities over recent years which undermines any need and cost justification for a brand new secondary school facility on a new site.

No

Representation ID: 2933

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Belle Homes Ltd

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

The proposed allocations in Balsall Common represents an increase in the size of the population for the village of approximately 39%. This is an over-concentration of growth on large sites in the wrong place adjacent to the detached rural village of Balsall Common. Development south of the settlement will have a significant and potentially unacceptable adverse impact on the existing community and infrastructure such as the road network and education.
There will be adverse impacts on the character of the landscape, the Green Belt, highway network, surrounding communities and infrastructure.

No

Representation ID: 2934

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Belle Homes Ltd

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

The proposed allocations in Balsall Common represents an increase in the size of the population for the village of approximately 39%. This is an over-concentration of growth on large sites in the wrong place adjacent to the detached rural village of Balsall Common. Development south of the settlement will have a significant and potentially unacceptable adverse impact on the existing community and infrastructure such as the road network and education.
There will be adverse impacts on the character of the landscape, the Green Belt, highway network, surrounding communities and infrastructure.

No

Representation ID: 2935

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Belle Homes Ltd

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

The proposed allocations in Balsall Common represents an increase in the size of the population for the village of approximately 39%. This is an over-concentration of growth on large sites in the wrong place adjacent to the detached rural village of Balsall Common. Development south of the settlement will have a significant and potentially unacceptable adverse impact on the existing community and infrastructure such as the road network and education.
There will be adverse impacts on the character of the landscape, the Green Belt, highway network, surrounding communities and infrastructure.

No

Representation ID: 2936

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Belle Homes Ltd

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Access would be inadequate.
Part of the site used as a sports and community facility. Allocation of the site in its entirety runs counter to the sustainable development objectives in the NPPF where the health and well-being of a community and the protection of existing community and recreational facilities are important objectives.
It is inappropriate for land at Solihull Arden Club to be developed. Development on Solihull Arden Club site would be unsound as no evidence has been provided to justify the loss.
Any required re-provision of sports facilities would raise viability and deliverability issues.