Draft Local Plan Review

No

Representation ID: 3454

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Hunter Page Planning

see supporting documents for Land North of Waste Lane BC.
1.05ha site off Waste Lane.
Considered suitable, available and achievable.

No

Representation ID: 3712

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Hunter Page Planning

Increase to 50% affordable housing not justified in text.
SHMA states need is 26.9% of new development.
Viability assessment on policy not been carried out.
Government attaches great importance to flexibility on Section 106 negotiations.
Very strict mix for market housing proposals.
Needs more evidence than the SHMA.

No

Representation ID: 3713

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Hunter Page Planning

2,000 contribution to GBHMA shortfall not fully justified in text.
Refers to Barton Willmore analysis of Solihull's housing need; recommends a minimum of 890 dpa for Solihull's OAN.
Concerned that housing and economic needs are not aligned.
Solihull should seek to provide a higher proportion of GBHMA shortfall due to location and housing and economic linkages.

No

Representation ID: 3714

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Hunter Page Planning

Green Belt release for housing is justified.
No evidence put forward to justify the dwelling numbers on larger proposed allocations.
On average it takes 6.5 years once an outline application has been submitted for dwellings to be delivered on larger strategic sites.
Therefore need more smaller sites to ensure continued delivery throughout Plan period, in particular around Balsall Common and Knowle.
1,150 dwellings proposed for Balsall Common is supported as a minimum.

No

Representation ID: 3716

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Hunter Page Planning

Policy P11 - 110L per person per day is not justified in the text.
Water Cycle study has not identified Solihull as a water stress area.

No

Representation ID: 3717

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Hunter Page Planning

Policy P15 - Overly prescriptive and places too many design requirements on future development proposals.

No

Representation ID: 3718

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Hunter Page Planning

Policy P18 - Health Impact Assessments should only be required for development proposals over 300 dwellings and are strategic in their nature given the limited opportunities to deliver such benefits through small scale housing sites.

No

Representation ID: 3723

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Hunter Page Planning

Object due to the:
Contribution it makes to the Green Belt;
Site constraints in SHELAA;
700 dwellings should be dispersed elsewhere.

No

Representation ID: 3724

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Hunter Page Planning

Object due to the:
Contribution it makes to the Green Belt;
Heritage assets;
Concerns in SHELAA;
20% in Flood Zone 3.
850 dwellings should be dispersed elsewhere.

No

Representation ID: 3725

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Hunter Page Planning

Site allocation too large.