Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Rosconn Stategic Land search
New searchYes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q19. Do you agree with the policies for protecting the environment? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 3981
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Rosconn Stategic Land
Agent: DS Planning
* Policy P9 Mitigating and Adapting to Climate Change - Agree in principle.
* Policy P10. Natural Environment - Agree in principle.
* Policy P11. Water Management - Agree in principle
* Policy P14. Amenity - Agree in principle.
see response and supporting documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q20. Do you agree with the policies for quality of place? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 3982
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Rosconn Stategic Land
Agent: DS Planning
* Policy P15. Securing Design Quality - Agree in principle
* Policy P16. Conservation of Heritage Assets and Local Distinctiveness -
Agree in principle.
* Policy P17. Countryside and Green Belt. - Agree in principle
see response and supporting documents
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q21. Do you agree with the policies health and supporting communities? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 3983
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Rosconn Stategic Land
Agent: DS Planning
* Policy P18. Health and Well Being - Agree in principle
* Policy P19. Range and Quality of Local Services - Agree in principle.
* Policy P20. Provision for Open Space, Children's Play, Sport, Recreation and
Leisure. - Agree in principle.
see response and supporting documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q22. Do you agree with the Policy P21? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 3984
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Rosconn Stategic Land
Agent: DS Planning
Agree in principle.
see response and supporting documents
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q5. Do you agree with the key objectives that development is expected to meet as identified in Policy P1 are appropriate? If not why not? Are there any others you think should be included?
Representation ID: 4040
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Rosconn Stategic Land
Agent: DS Planning
Lack of confidence that level of residential development will come forward within the plan period.
No certainty on timeframe of HS2 development, UK Central Hub Area in general and precise uses and percentages of different land uses in Hub.
Concern about effects of future Airport plans and its land requirements to expand.
see response and supporting documents
