Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Minton (CdeB) Ltd search
New searchYes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q1. Do you agree that we've identified the right challenges facing the Borough? If not why not? Are there any additional challenges that should be addressed?
Representation ID: 3477
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd
Agent: DS Planning
Yes, agree with the challenges identified particularly meeting housing need
across the Borough, including the Borough's own need and where possible
assisting with accommodating the HMA wider shortfall.
see attached response and supporting documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q2. Do you agree with the Borough Vision we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 3999
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd
Agent: DS Planning
Agree in principle and in particular:
Rural area Vision and sustaining network of strong and vibrant communities & increased range of affordable housing.
However, concerned over lack of reference to Catherine de Barnes in the 'distinct places' section.
Cdb has strong, vibrant community, some facilities and accepted successful housing development.
see attached response and supporting documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q3. Do you agree with the spatial strategy we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4000
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd
Agent: DS Planning
Agree in principle, in particular:
balanced approach between concentration and dispersal of housing.
Exceptions are:
Growth option F should include Catherine de Barnes (Para. 108).
Spatial Strategy diagram should include Catherine de Barnes.
see attached response and supporting documents
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q4. Do you agree with Policy P1? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4001
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd
Agent: DS Planning
Lack of confidence that level of residential development will come forward within the plan period.
No certainty on timeframe of HS2 development, UK Central Hub Area in general and precise uses and percentages of different land uses in Hub.
Concern about effects of future Airport plans and its land requirements to expand.
see attached response and supporting documents
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q5. Do you agree with the key objectives that development is expected to meet as identified in Policy P1 are appropriate? If not why not? Are there any others you think should be included?
Representation ID: 4002
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd
Agent: DS Planning
Lack of confidence that level of residential development will come forward within the plan period.
No certainty on timeframe of HS2 development, UK Central Hub Area in general and precise uses and percentages of different land uses in Hub.
Concern about effects of future Airport plans and its land requirements to expand.
see attached response and supporting documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q7. Do you agree with Policy P2? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4003
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd
Agent: DS Planning
Agree in principle, particularly ambitions for Solihull Town Centre.
However, increasing residential capacity and the relocation of the train station
closer to the town centre have been longstanding ambitions.
Whilst these are supported they have not moved forward towards realisation and remain ambitions.
Doubtful that 861 homes in plan period or 1400 homes overall is achievable.
see attached response and supporting documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q9. Do you agree with Policy P3? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4004
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd
Agent: DS Planning
Agree in principle.
Note that alternative uses may be allowed where specific criteria are met.
Concern that employment sites are not sacrificed inappropriately due to the housing shortage.
see attached response and supporting documents
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q11. Do you agree with Policy P4? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4005
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd
Agent: DS Planning
The Affordable Housing figure of 50% is too high and a potential impediment to housing delivery.
The full implications of the housing white paper need to be assessed and would reserve judgement on a final policy.
see attached response and supporting documents
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?
Representation ID: 4006
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd
Agent: DS Planning
Concern that the full OAHN presented in the SHMA provides an underestimate of housing need in the Borough in accordance with current guidance.
The SDLP is therefore not planning for the correct number of homes to meet
housing need and the housing target should be increased.
Further work being carried out by broader HMA will need to be taken into account.
see attached response and supporting documents
No
Draft Local Plan Review
17 Solihull - Moat Lane/Vulcan Road
Representation ID: 4007
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd
Agent: DS Planning
Concern about ability to bring forward current employment sites at this location within the Plan period and the potential conflict with the employment policy P3 on retention of employment land.
Relocation of employment uses may be an option but to where within Solihull? No indication is given within the Plan of such an option.
see attached response and supporting documents