Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Summix (FHS) Developments Ltd search
New searchNo
Draft Local Plan Review
Alternative Site Suggested (New Site)
Representation ID: 3581
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Summix (FHS) Developments Ltd
Agent: Framptons Planning
Land at Fulford Hall Farm, Tidbury Green.
Submitted after 2015-2016 Call for Sites exercise.
Viable land values.
Potential to cater for full range of housing needs, particularly higher wealth families that the conurbation needs to retain and attract for its economic growth.
Sustainable and accessible location close to main housing need from Birmingham.
Capacity for 1000 dwellings up to 2033.
Market support.
WSP Transport Study concludes development of this site would be in line with transport policy and has potential for highway and sustainable transport benefits.
WSP Infrastructure Study have confirmed advice from Western Power and Severn Trent.
Sustainable location.
Please see attached the following submission to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Review Consultation.
We have produced the following documents to form part of our submission:
* Solihull Draft Local Plan Representations (Framptons, February 2017)
* Appendix A - Green Belt, Landscape and Masterplanning Report (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix B - A Vision for Tidbury Green (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix C - Review of SDLPR Sustainability Appraisal - (JAM Consult Ltd, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 1 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 2 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Figures (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix E - Infrastructure and Utilities Note (WSP, February 2017)
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q3. Do you agree with the spatial strategy we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4171
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Summix (FHS) Developments Ltd
Agent: Framptons Planning
Accept that there are 'exceptional circumstances' justifying the altering of Green Belt boundaries to accommodate housing (and employment) requirements.
Does not give proper consideration to the strategic role and function of the West Midlands green belt.
DLP has been published in advance of the satisfactory resolution of the apportionment of meeting the needs of Birmingham, nor indeed any proper consideration of this important strategic issue.
Not possible at this stage to identify the full housing needs across the housing market area.
Please see attached the following submission to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Review Consultation.
We have produced the following documents to form part of our submission:
* Solihull Draft Local Plan Representations (Framptons, February 2017)
* Appendix A - Green Belt, Landscape and Masterplanning Report (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix B - A Vision for Tidbury Green (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix C - Review of SDLPR Sustainability Appraisal - (JAM Consult Ltd, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 1 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 2 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Figures (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix E - Infrastructure and Utilities Note (WSP, February 2017)
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?
Representation ID: 4172
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Summix (FHS) Developments Ltd
Agent: Framptons Planning
DLP has been published in advance of the satisfactory resolution of the apportionment of meeting the needs of Birmingham, nor indeed any proper consideration of this important strategic issue.
Therefore not possible at this stage to identify the full housing needs across the housing market area in compliance with paragraph 159 of the Framework.
Not taking 'fair share' of HMA shortfall; should be regional decision.
Please see attached the following submission to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Review Consultation.
We have produced the following documents to form part of our submission:
* Solihull Draft Local Plan Representations (Framptons, February 2017)
* Appendix A - Green Belt, Landscape and Masterplanning Report (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix B - A Vision for Tidbury Green (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix C - Review of SDLPR Sustainability Appraisal - (JAM Consult Ltd, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 1 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 2 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Figures (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix E - Infrastructure and Utilities Note (WSP, February 2017)
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q23. Are there any other comments you wish to make on the Draft Local Plan?
Representation ID: 4173
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Summix (FHS) Developments Ltd
Agent: Framptons Planning
Green Belt Assessment.
LDA Design undertaken review of Atkins (2016) Green Belt Assessment technical paper).
Find it flawed in relation to proposed site for following reasons:
- Purposes 4 and 5 of Green Belt are not applicable
- Purpose 1: Tidbury Green is ribbon development and not a built up area.
- Purpose 2: Green corridor along River Cole could prevent Tidbury Green merging with Wythall. Terry's Green already separated by Clowes Wood and Earlswood Lakes.
- Purpose 3: Character of site is strongly enclosed by hedgerows and trees.
Please see attached the following submission to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Review Consultation.
We have produced the following documents to form part of our submission:
* Solihull Draft Local Plan Representations (Framptons, February 2017)
* Appendix A - Green Belt, Landscape and Masterplanning Report (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix B - A Vision for Tidbury Green (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix C - Review of SDLPR Sustainability Appraisal - (JAM Consult Ltd, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 1 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 2 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Figures (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix E - Infrastructure and Utilities Note (WSP, February 2017)
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q23. Are there any other comments you wish to make on the Draft Local Plan?
Representation ID: 4174
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Summix (FHS) Developments Ltd
Agent: Framptons Planning
Sustainability Appraisal.
JAM Consult Ltd have reviewed the Council's Sustainability Appraisal, and find it flawed in a number of ways:
Gaps and out of date information in baseline data, including GBA and SHMA.
SA Framework flawed, objectives unclear.
Compatibility assessment not been carried out.
SA methodology not explained in terms of PPG definitions.
Separate Site Assessment methodology is not explained.
Fails to consider reasonable alternatives that could deliver the necessary levels of development.
SA and Site Assessment Methodology need to be reviewed urgently.
Please see attached the following submission to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Review Consultation.
We have produced the following documents to form part of our submission:
* Solihull Draft Local Plan Representations (Framptons, February 2017)
* Appendix A - Green Belt, Landscape and Masterplanning Report (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix B - A Vision for Tidbury Green (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix C - Review of SDLPR Sustainability Appraisal - (JAM Consult Ltd, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 1 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 2 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Figures (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix E - Infrastructure and Utilities Note (WSP, February 2017)
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q16. Do you believe we have identified the infrastructure[35] required to support these developments? If not why not? Are there any additional facilities you believe are required, if so what are the
Representation ID: 4175
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Summix (FHS) Developments Ltd
Agent: Framptons Planning
Acknowledging that any more substantial release of Green Belt land in Solihull would require additional infrastructure to that proposed in the SDLPR, the evidence base fails to consider reasonable alternatives that could deliver the necessary levels of development.
Please see attached the following submission to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Review Consultation.
We have produced the following documents to form part of our submission:
* Solihull Draft Local Plan Representations (Framptons, February 2017)
* Appendix A - Green Belt, Landscape and Masterplanning Report (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix B - A Vision for Tidbury Green (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix C - Review of SDLPR Sustainability Appraisal - (JAM Consult Ltd, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 1 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 2 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Figures (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix E - Infrastructure and Utilities Note (WSP, February 2017)
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q15. Do you believe we are planning to build new homes in the right locations? If not why not, and which locations do you believe shouldn't be included? Are there any other locations that you think
Representation ID: 4176
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Summix (FHS) Developments Ltd
Agent: Framptons Planning
Agree with need to release Green Belt land for housing.
Misconception that Solihull has sufficient brownfield land to recycle.
Housing land assessment is flawed.
Housing should be located close to main conurbation, not increase journey times and congestion through Green Belt.
Areas around Dickens Heath, Tidbury Green, Cheswick Green and Blythe Valley Park are optimal locations.
Large proportion of capacity is located where the housing market is weakest and viability is most challenged; not deliverable.
Failure to adequately consider the capacity of the housing market in Solihull to absorb higher levels of new housebuilding over the plan period.
Please see attached the following submission to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Review Consultation.
We have produced the following documents to form part of our submission:
* Solihull Draft Local Plan Representations (Framptons, February 2017)
* Appendix A - Green Belt, Landscape and Masterplanning Report (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix B - A Vision for Tidbury Green (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix C - Review of SDLPR Sustainability Appraisal - (JAM Consult Ltd, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 1 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 2 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Figures (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix E - Infrastructure and Utilities Note (WSP, February 2017)
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q23. Are there any other comments you wish to make on the Draft Local Plan?
Representation ID: 4200
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Summix (FHS) Developments Ltd
Agent: Framptons Planning
General comments:
Does not provide evidence on how DLP will achieve sustainable development.
Housing sites are driven by political acceptability rather than any objective assessment of the situation.
Please see attached the following submission to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Review Consultation.
We have produced the following documents to form part of our submission:
* Solihull Draft Local Plan Representations (Framptons, February 2017)
* Appendix A - Green Belt, Landscape and Masterplanning Report (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix B - A Vision for Tidbury Green (LDA, February 2017)
* Appendix C - Review of SDLPR Sustainability Appraisal - (JAM Consult Ltd, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 1 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Part 2 (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix D - Transportation Note Figures (WSP, February 2017)
* Appendix E - Infrastructure and Utilities Note (WSP, February 2017)
