Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Warwickshire Wildlife Trust search
New searchNo
Draft Local Plan Review
10 Meriden - West of Meriden
Representation ID: 2537
Received: 14/02/2017
Respondent: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust
Contains fields that are identified as a potential Local Wildlife Site.
The LWS panel should be commissioned to survey and assess this site against the LWS criteria as a priority so as to inform the scheme design.
LWS areas should be protected and enhanced as part of the development.
Protection and enhancement of the LWS should be added to the likely infrastructure requirements.
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
18 Solihull - Sharmans Cross Road
Representation ID: 2538
Received: 14/02/2017
Respondent: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust
Pow Grove Local Wildlife Site forms the western and southern boundaries of this site allocation, part of which includes ancient woodland. Mitigation will need to be in place to make sure that there is no direct or indirect harm to these habitats. Ancient woodland will need a semi-natural buffer to protect it from harm from neighbouring development.
Likely that the Green Infrastructure required will need to include a semi-natural buffer of the neighbouring ancient woodland so as to protect it from harm.
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q17. Do you agree with Policy P6? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 2541
Received: 14/02/2017
Respondent: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust
Suggest amended wording to bullet point 4:
Any unacceptable adverse impact on landscape or local nature conservation designations, ecology, biodiversity or the historic environment can be avoided or mitigated;
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q19. Do you agree with the policies for protecting the environment? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 2543
Received: 14/02/2017
Respondent: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust
Recommendchange to the paragraph on Biodiversity and Geodiversity (see full response).
Disagree with paragraph on LWS, LNR and Geological Sites. Should not be differentiated in terms of avoidance (see full response).
see attached response
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q20. Do you agree with the policies for quality of place? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 2544
Received: 14/02/2017
Respondent: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust
Agree with proposals being expected to conserve, restore or enhance biodiversity.
see attached response
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q22. Do you agree with the Policy P21? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 2546
Received: 14/02/2017
Respondent: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust
Agree.
see attached response
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q21. Do you agree with the policies health and supporting communities? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?
Representation ID: 2549
Received: 14/02/2017
Respondent: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust
Agree with the inclusion of nature conservation and green infrastructure within this policy.
see attached response