Draft Local Plan Review

No

Representation ID: 2874

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: CPRE Warwickshire Branch

policies will not deliver sustainable travel - do not address congestion and pressure on key roads/m42.
- should be proposals for cycle routes and a cycle network
- re-siting of HS2 platforms to Birmingham International to protect the Green Belt east of M42.
-

No

Representation ID: 2875

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: CPRE Warwickshire Branch

Chapter 9 covers a range of environmental policies. Policy for the Green Belt is not one. Green Belt is a planning and not an environmental designation so it would not be correct to have a Green belt policy in Chapter 9.
No clear Policy setting out the aims and purposes of the Green Belt and how these will be applied. A separate Policy is needed for the Green Belt. Compare the absence of such a Policy with Policies C1, C2 and C3 on the 2006 UDP, all Policies for Solihull's Green Belt

Don't Know

Representation ID: 4670

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: CPRE Warwickshire Branch

see response to Q8

No

Representation ID: 4706

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: CPRE Warwickshire Branch

should be removed from the section of the Plan relating to Policy P3

No

Representation ID: 4707

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: CPRE Warwickshire Branch

should be removed from the section of the plan relating to policy P3

No

Representation ID: 4710

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: CPRE Warwickshire Branch

the Draft Plan overprovides seriously

A better figure would therefore be 4,654 dwellings to be added to the provision already made in the adopted Local Plan.

No

Representation ID: 4713

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: CPRE Warwickshire Branch

Small sites of 5-100 dwellings in a range of locations including at Hockley Heath and Dorridge. (See pages 4-5 above for detailed justification for selecting small sites instead of the large allocations proposed.)