Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Search representations

Results for Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Forum CIO search

New search New search

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Introduction

Representation ID: 13736

Received: 10/12/2020

Respondent: Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Forum CIO

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The Introduction needs to be modified to indicate that, following adoption of the Local Plan, neighbourhood plans will still be part of the development plan. In addition, neighbourhood plan policies that provide a more appropriate local expression should be identified in the related settlement chapter / allocation policy and not left to the decision maker.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P4A Meeting Housing Needs – Affordable Housing

Representation ID: 13737

Received: 10/12/2020

Respondent: Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Forum CIO

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Policy P4A does not address occupation by households with a strong local connection. Whilst the local needs of households are covered in Policy P4B, this is only in relation to rural exception sites. There is a failure to recognise the presence of neighbourhood plan policy dealing with local needs affordable housing on allocated housing sites. In addition, differences regarding the tenure split are not acknowledged.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P4C – Meeting Housing Needs - Market Housing

Representation ID: 13738

Received: 10/12/2020

Respondent: Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Forum CIO

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The recommended market mix in this policy differs from Policy H3 Market Mix of the Knowle Dorridge and Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Plan. This was ‘made’ in April 2019 and is up to date and relevant. It is noted that para 187 states that relevant policies in neighbourhood plans will be taken into consideration along with other matters. However, the other matters are also referenced within the policy. In view of the role and status of neighbourhood plans, they should also be included in the policy.
The policy indicates that concept masterplans will include details of the likely required profile of household types. This is missing from the Masterplans.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P5 – Provision of Land for Housing

Representation ID: 13739

Received: 10/12/2020

Respondent: Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Forum CIO

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Objection relates to Housing Requirement for Designated Neighbourhood Areas - The housing number identified for the Knowle, Dorridge and Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Area (808) is derived from the estimated capacity of the selected sites. The Forum has raised issues around the policies and concept masterplans for these sites which seek modification to that number. The Forum would oppose any further site allocations to compensate for reduced capacities on allocated sites.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P5 – Provision of Land for Housing

Representation ID: 13740

Received: 10/12/2020

Respondent: Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Forum CIO

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Objection relates to density - The content of the Plan in relation to density is not clear and unambiguous. The application of Policy P5 and the indicative density tables are inconsistent with site allocation polices KN1 and KN2 and their concept masterplans. The provisions do not reflect the Neighbourhood Plan policies nor the published evidence base relating to local character and masterplanning.
The density table at Paragraph 240 indicates that mixed development density should be 40-50 dph for limited or significant extensions at the edge of larger villages. However, proposed densities in Knowle above 40 dph on site allocations would be out of character with the area and its surroundings.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P5 – Provision of Land for Housing

Representation ID: 13741

Received: 10/12/2020

Respondent: Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Forum CIO

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Concept masterplans are discussed in the justification to Policy P5. However, they are not addressed within the policy itself. Given their importance, key provisions should be included within the strategic policy. The provisions also need to be strengthened so as to give confidence to the public and a clear steer to developers. The status of the concept masterplans as part of the Local Plan needs to be confirmed.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath

Representation ID: 13742

Received: 10/12/2020

Respondent: Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Forum CIO

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Representations are made relating to, amongst other things, lack of clarity over application of Neighbourhood Plan policies; the deliverability of the Knowle site allocations, in particular the community facilities; effectiveness of infrastructure mitigation measures; and concerns around concept masterplans, design and densities.
Modifications to the Knowle, Dorridge and Bentley Heath (KDBH) Settlement Chapter are needed regarding public transport; highway improvements; community access; affordable housing; primary health care; and densities.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy KN1 - Hampton Road, Knowle

Representation ID: 13743

Received: 10/12/2020

Respondent: Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Forum CIO

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

There is an ‘in principle’ concern about the lack of evidence to demonstrate the viability and deliverability of this allocation, including the ability of the football club to relocate. A raft of measures are needed to add to or strengthen policy provisions in relation to the allocation. They concern densities; Grimshaw Hall; trees and hedgerows; footpaths; engineering works; community use; primary health care; highway improvements; and concept masterplans.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy KN2 : South of Knowle (Arden Triangle)

Representation ID: 13744

Received: 10/12/2020

Respondent: Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Forum CIO

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

These representations address firstly, an objection to the lack of evidence regarding the deliverability of this allocation: and secondly, a raft of measures that are needed to add to or strengthen policy provisions in relation to site KN2: South of Knowle (Arden Triangle). They concern densities; community access; highway access; trees and hedgerows; structure planting; primary health care; bus services; footpaths; and concept masterplans.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Foreword

Representation ID: 13745

Received: 10/12/2020

Respondent: Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath Neighbourhood Forum CIO

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Relates to Masterplan Document - The status of the masterplan document is ambiguous. It should be made clear that the concept masterplans are an integral part of the Local Plan and that adherence to key principles will be required; also, that only minor changes are envisaged in the future.
Essential matters and key principles of development should be clearly stated requirements and distinguished from any material that might be illustrative.
Densities differ between what is contained in the MP document and table at para 240 of the LP.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.