Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Search representations

Results for Richard Cobb Planning search

New search New search

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

UK Central Hub

Representation ID: 10918

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The Arden Eco Park site has not been properly considered in the Local Plan process but its direct relationship with HS2 and Arden Cross should afford it as both a site for employment uses and for an Energy from Waste facility to serve the needs of Arden Cross and the rest of the UK Central strategic site in which the lies.

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P3 Provision of Land for General Business and Premises

Representation ID: 10919

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The Local Plan does not properly address the need for provision of land for Local employment uses in Balsall Common and Knowle.

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Sustainable Economic Growth

Representation ID: 10921

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The Arden Eco Park site has been submitted under the Council’s Call for Sites in relation to the Local Plan as land for business and employment uses given into extensive past history. The Local Plan has not recognised that submission and no provision is being made in the plan for the site to contribute positively to needs of the Solihull Economic Gateway which it is well placed to do. This would include employment uses as well as an Energy from Waste facility.

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy SO1 - East of Solihull

Representation ID: 10922

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Site of !47 Lugtrout Lane is a free standing site with the broad allocation of SO1. The landowner is prepared to contribute her site to the larger housing site as long as she can develop the land with a few houses and can contribute to some open space provision. versions of the masterplan show her site included as a small development site but others do not show it. the matter needs clarification.

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

UK Central Hub

Representation ID: 10924

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

No opportunity is given in the consultation for making comments about Arden Eco Park which is located within the UK Hub Central corridor

Arden Eco Park is a major land use site which was submitted as an employment site under the call for sites but that request was not properly dealt with by the Council.

The EcoPark is well related to the HS2 Interchange and well placed to serve the Arden Cross Development and the area as whole in terms of employment uses and for an Energy from Waste facility to supply power to Arden Cross.

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy BC3 - Kenilworth Road/Windmill Lane, Balsall Common

Representation ID: 13786

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Objection (Wants site BC3 removed from Solihull Draft Submission Local Plan and Final Local Plan): Fails 3/4 tests of soundness.
> Not positively prepared as it is not practical to deliver the unmet need of the HMA (2105 units). NPPF para. 11 has not been given due consideration. To build 4410 units (Greenfield) and 1195 units (Meridian Gap) is not required to comply with planning policy. Furthermore, site BC3 specifically is not sustainable using the council’s own criteria.
> Allocation of site BC3 has not been justified. Omission of sites within Balsall common and in the wider Borough which should have been chosen based on merit or for which the omission has not been justified. Final findings from Solihull Town Centre Masterplan are not incorporated and cannot be reconciled with the Draft Local Plan.
>Inconsistencies with the NPPF, specifically para 1; 94; 108; 109; 122; 138; 185 and 194 are not complied with. Sustainable development will not be complied with if site BC3 remains in the Draft Local Plan.
>Wishes to preserve the biodiverse rich habitat that is Site BC3 and protect the character of the Grade II Listed Berkswell Windmill.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.