Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Search representations

Results for Golden End Farms search

New search New search

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P4A Meeting Housing Needs – Affordable Housing

Representation ID: 11036

Received: 13/12/2020

Respondent: Golden End Farms

Agent: Delta Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Support the general approach of securing 40% affordable housing but disagree with paragraph 6 which does not comply with national policy and is therefore unsound.
Paragraph 6 is not consistent with paragraphs 1 and 2 of the policy or paragraph 177. It does not reflect national guidance to ensure that the provision that is secured caters for all tenure needs to enable mixed and balanced communities to be created. It is inflexible as it refers only to social rent and shared ownership, not other tenures that may be supported by the Council.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P5 – Provision of Land for Housing

Representation ID: 11038

Received: 13/12/2020

Respondent: Golden End Farms

Agent: Delta Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Provision of housing land significantly underprovides for the housing needs arising from the growth strategy. HS2 and UKC will have a profound effect on the Borough but the Plan fails to accommodate the housing need that will arise from it. Whilst historically there may have been significant in-commuting, this likely results from previously constrained housing supply. The Council should seek to reverse historic commuting patterns and provide housing to meet more of the forecasted jobs growth.
Also questions whether the plan does enough to help meet the wider housing shortfall in the housing market area, particularly beyond 2031.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Knowle, Dorridge & Bentley Heath

Representation ID: 11044

Received: 13/12/2020

Respondent: Golden End Farms

Agent: Delta Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The site selection process is unsound. Additional land releases should be included in the plan to support sustainable patterns of growth and meet needs. Golden End Farm is more suitable than proposed allocations in the settlement.
Both allocations in Knowle have complex issues. No confidence that these sites can deliver the housing and infrastructure proposed, or what stage in the plan period they would come forward. Viability of these sites is also questionable.
Golden End Farm should be included as an allocation. It is in a highly sustainable location and can provide an immediate contribution to housing delivery.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy KN1 - Hampton Road, Knowle

Representation ID: 11045

Received: 13/12/2020

Respondent: Golden End Farms

Agent: Delta Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Securing the benefit of an improved football club may not be achievable and only housing north of Hampton Road would be delivered.
Uncertainty over whether a comprehensive development is achievable and concern over deliverability and viability.
Site faces many challenges including topography, site capacity (due to site constraint mitigation), timing of club relocation. The site is complex and housing will not be delivered until later in the plan period.
If no co-ordinated approach to delivery of the whole site can be demonstrated, including viability regarding relocation of the Football Club, the allocation is not sound and should be removed.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy KN2 : South of Knowle (Arden Triangle)

Representation ID: 11046

Received: 13/12/2020

Respondent: Golden End Farms

Agent: Delta Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Questionable whether a comprehensive development is achievable, deliverable or viable. The school is promoted as a key benefit but concern that this may not be realised and that only the housing off Warwick Road or Grove Road is ever delivered.
Site faces complex issues meaning that much of the housing will not be delivered until the later in the plan period.
If there is no co-ordinated approach to delivery of the whole site and a high degree of confidence that the future redevelopment of the existing school is viable, then the site allocation should be considered not sound and removed.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.