Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Search representations

Results for William Davis Ltd search

New search New search

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Foreword

Representation ID: 13806

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

Agent: Define Planning & Design

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The plan does not allow for a simple and enforceable interpretation, contrary to Paragraph 16d of the National Planning Policy Framework. Longer policies should be separated by topic to ensure they are not too lengthy. For example Policy P5 relates to several key issues within one policy which is not suitable- numerous policies would be more effective.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P1 UK Central Solihull Hub Area

Representation ID: 13816

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

Agent: Define Planning & Design

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Support the principle of the approach taken in relation to the UK Central Solihull Hub Area and development adjacent to the HS2 hub.

The Council are heavily reliant on timely delivery from these larger sites however there is uncertainty. The length of the total development process increases with site size. The rate of delivery is wholly unrealistic at the NEC as commencement would not begin until approximately 2030. At Arden Cross, the situation is complex and dependent upon the delivery of HS2. Inefficient delivery of transport and utilities infrastructure represents a significant constraint to delivery.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P4A Meeting Housing Needs – Affordable Housing

Representation ID: 13817

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

Agent: Define Planning & Design

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The viability and deliverability of development sites should not compromised by over ambitious requirements to deliver affordable housing.

The definition of affordable should be set out in the Plan as policies that have a cost implication on development proposals cannot be deferred to a Supplementary Planning Document.

Policy P4A does not allow for First Homes / Discounted Market Sales as part of the mix and is therefore not consistent with Paragraph 35d of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P4C – Meeting Housing Needs - Market Housing

Representation ID: 13818

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

Agent: Define Planning & Design

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Do not support the inclusion of a market housing mix within Policy P4C. The housing mix may quickly become out-of-date. The Council should allow flexibility to take into account site specifics and market demand.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P4D – Meeting Housing Needs - Self and Custom Housebuilding

Representation ID: 13819

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

Agent: Define Planning & Design

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

An individual showing interest via a Housing and Custom Build Registers rarely equates to a genuine desire / ability to build on a Self / Custom Build plot. The actual demand is likely to be significantly lower.

The blanket policy approach, requiring 5% of open market dwellings to be delivered in the form of Self and Custom Build Plots on sites of 100 dwellings or more, does not take account of localised needs or site specific constraints to delivery.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P4E – Meeting Housing Needs - Housing for Older and Disabled People

Representation ID: 13821

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

Agent: Define Planning & Design

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

There is no sufficient evidence, including in the HEDNA, to suggest that 95% of dwellings should be provided to M4(2) standard. Policy requirement should not undermine the deliverability of sites in the Borough.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P5 – Provision of Land for Housing

Representation ID: 13823

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

Agent: Define Planning & Design

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The housing requirement should be clearly set out within Policy P5 and should form the basis of the Council’s monitoring of land supply.

If a ‘stepped’ approach to the housing requirement be taken forward, that should be clearly set out within Policy P5.

HS2 must be considered an exceptional circumstance to boost housing delivery within the Borough above that minimum local housing need. The scale employment growth proposed means the actual housing need will be higher than that derived from historic household projections.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P5 – Provision of Land for Housing

Representation ID: 13824

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

Agent: Define Planning & Design

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The intention to make provision to meet the unmet housing needs arising within the Greater Birmingham should be set out within Policy P5.

The origin of the contribution of 2,105 dwellings to the Greater Birmingham Housing Market Area is unclear.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P5 – Provision of Land for Housing

Representation ID: 13825

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

Agent: Define Planning & Design

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Insufficient evidence of 10% non delivery rate that is applied to sites within planning permission that have not yet started construction, sites identified in land availability assessments, the Brownfield Land Register and the extant Solihull Local Plan.

The windfall allowance of 200dpa is a considerable figure. Development on windfall sites may well become increasingly limited / depleted.

The supply is dominated by large sites, which often experience delay. The deliverability of a number of sites is uncertain.

The Council must provide clear evidence of the trajectories and build-out rates of all sites.

The Council should allocate additional housing above its housing requirement to represent a buffer and ensure flexibility. SMBC should identify a further 4,077 dwellings (20% uplift) on small-medium sized sites in sustainable settlements.

Old Station Road, Hampton in Arden is suitable, available and achievable within the first five years of the plan period. Technical and environmental assessments have been undertaken, demonstrating there are no insurmountable constraints.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Hampton-in-Arden

Representation ID: 13826

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

Agent: Define Planning & Design

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The plan does not provide a Spatial Strategy to clearly specify how development is to be guided, resulting in an illogical approach.

Calculating the housing requirement of Neighbourhood Area wholly on the basis of capacity is not robust and fails to consider the distinction between the specific housing needs of the area, and the ability of the area to meet that need.

Site S01 comprises the bulk of provision in the Hampton in Arden Neighbourhood Area. The site has land assembly issues which could impact upon delivery. Housing in this location will meet the need arising from Solihull town rather than Hampton-in-Arden and Catherine-de-Barnes. Development should be focused on suitable sites within the settlement of Hampton-in-Arden.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.