Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Search representations

Results for Domino’s Pizza UK & Ireland search

New search New search

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P18 Health and Wellbeing

Representation ID: 14118

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Domino’s Pizza UK & Ireland

Agent: DPP Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

There is no sound justification for criteria 3 to 5 of Policy P18.

No evidence to justify that locating any A5/Sui Generis use within certain distances of schools causes adverse health consequences. The evidence base documents do not refer to takeaways as a specific issue, make a link between the location of schools next to hot food takeaways and unhealthy eating habits, or identify a proliferation of such uses where obesity rates are higher in specific wards within the Council’s area.
Solihull fares very well in terms of childhood obesity, therefore it is difficult therefore to understand the evidence to justify Policy P18.

The approach conflicts with national policy which contains no support for a policy containing a blanket ban or exclusion zone for A5 uses. The sequential approach (as detailed at paragraph 86 of the National Planning Policy Framework) would be undermined by the approach as the policy provides no flexibility for sites which could be within 400m of a school but within a designated centre.

Domino’s support any initiative to promote health, wellbeing, and obesity. The positive economic benefits of a Domino’s are significant. National policy places significant weight on economic health/growth.

Change suggested by respondent:

Criterion 3 should be re-worded to deal only with the amenity impacts of such a use.

Criteria 4 and 5 should be deleted from the plan and policy altogether.

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam

On Behalf of Domino's Pizza UK & Ireland, please find enclosed representations in respect of Policy P18 Health & Wellbeing of the Draft Submission Version of the Solihull Local Plan Review.

Attached is the Representation Form along with a covering letter which sets out the case in detail.

I trust this is sufficient, however, if anything further is required, please do not hesitate to ask.

Regards

Osian

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P18 Health and Wellbeing

Representation ID: 14119

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Domino’s Pizza UK & Ireland

Agent: DPP Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The Policy P18 approach has been found unsound by several planning inspectors elsewhere, both at appeal and Local Plan examination stage. The London Borough of Waltham Forest had such a policy in place for over a decade and its application has proven ineffective in tackling obesity. Nottingham City Council have very recently had a similar policy thrown out by the Local Plan Inspector.

Change suggested by respondent:

Criterion 3 should be re-worded to deal only with the amenity impacts of such a use.

Criteria 4 and 5 should be deleted from the plan and policy altogether.

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam

On Behalf of Domino's Pizza UK & Ireland, please find enclosed representations in respect of Policy P18 Health & Wellbeing of the Draft Submission Version of the Solihull Local Plan Review.

Attached is the Representation Form along with a covering letter which sets out the case in detail.

I trust this is sufficient, however, if anything further is required, please do not hesitate to ask.

Regards

Osian

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Policy P18 Health and Wellbeing

Representation ID: 14120

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Domino’s Pizza UK & Ireland

Agent: DPP Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Policy P18 takes an inconsistent approach towards new development that sells food and discriminates against operations with an A5 use, leaving nowhere reasonable for them to locate. The approach is likely to result in significant harmful impacts on the local economy.

Change suggested by respondent:

Criterion 3 should be re-worded to deal only with the amenity impacts of such a use.

Criteria 4 and 5 should be deleted from the plan and policy altogether.

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam

On Behalf of Domino's Pizza UK & Ireland, please find enclosed representations in respect of Policy P18 Health & Wellbeing of the Draft Submission Version of the Solihull Local Plan Review.

Attached is the Representation Form along with a covering letter which sets out the case in detail.

I trust this is sufficient, however, if anything further is required, please do not hesitate to ask.

Regards

Osian

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.