No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 1047
Received: 12/02/2017
Respondent: Mr David Ellis
None of the existing or proposed developments in Balsall Common meets the requirements of point 2 P7. Additional parking will be needed at the train station especially if Hall Meadow Road would no longer be used for overflow vehicles(would become part of the by-pass). Better train service essential as current one is already at full capacity(standing AND seating ) at peak times.
All proposed developments in Balsall Common will be car dependent. Under Policy P8 it states in these circumstances the Council would be unlikely to support such developments
None of the existing or proposed developments in Balsall Common meets the requirements of point 2 P7. Additional parking will be needed at the train station especially if Hall Meadow Road would no longer be used for overflow vehicles(would become part of the by-pass). Better train service essential as current one is already at full capacity(standing AND seating ) at peak times.
All proposed developments in Balsall Common will be car dependent. Under Policy P8 it states in these circumstances the Council would be unlikely to support such developments