Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 10867

Received: 13/12/2020

Respondent: Dr Richard Anderson

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Balsall Common Developments

The Plan's aspiration to maintain the Meriden Gap green belt is in conflict with the detail.

IT IS GREEN BELT. Therefore, development on it can only be justified if there is overwhelming evidence that ALL OTHER ALTERNATIVES have been considered and analysed in detail, and found wanting. I have not seen this evidence, do not believe the Council have it, and believe the Council has the attitude, "how can we justify building on it", rather than, "how can we avoid building on it".

Change suggested by respondent:

Avoid developing green belt land.

Full text:

Balsall Common Developments

The Plan's aspiration to maintain the Meriden Gap green belt is in conflict with the detail.

IT IS GREEN BELT. Therefore, development on it can only be justified if there is overwhelming evidence that ALL OTHER ALTERNATIVES have been considered and analysed in detail, and found wanting. I have not seen this evidence, do not believe the Council have it, and believe the Council has the attitude, "how can we justify building on it", rather than, "how can we avoid building on it".