Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 10932

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: mr Graham Cockroft

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The location of the proposed new Green Belt boundary is unclear. The present boundary has been long established and marks a sharp distinction between open farmland and urban usage. Such boundaries should not be altered unless they can be replaced by an equally strong permanent boundary. BL2. 4. refers to Green Belt enhancements and a country park, with no information on their scope, extent or boundaries. This affects the viability of remaining farmland, and could heave a serious impact on Cheswick Green. The much narrower Green Belt risks failing to properly fulfil GB purposes.

Change suggested by respondent:

Delete BL2.

Or at least clarify the location, form and appropriateness of the new green belt boundary.

Define the extent, purpose, uses and features of the proposed Country Park, and its impact on Cheswick Green.

Full text:

The location of the proposed new Green Belt boundary is unclear. The present boundary has been long established and marks a sharp distinction between open farmland and urban usage. Such boundaries should not be altered unless they can be replaced by an equally strong permanent boundary. BL2. 4. refers to Green Belt enhancements and a country park, with no information on their scope, extent or boundaries. This affects the viability of remaining farmland, and could heave a serious impact on Cheswick Green. The much narrower Green Belt risks failing to properly fulfil GB purposes.