No

Draft Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 125

Received: 11/01/2017

Respondent: Mr Harry Siggs

Representation Summary:

Object to Green Belt development in Balsall Common. No exceptional circumstances to justify development. Brownfield sites in the Borough should be used.

Full text:

I am very concerned to learn that once again Solihull BC is exploring the possibility of developing green field space in Balsall Common to provide additional residential accommodation for the borough.
As I am sure you are aware, the National Planning Policy Framework for England provides very clear guidance on its website: "the fundamental aim of Green Belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open; the essential characteristics of Green Belts are their openness and their permanence. Once established, Green Belt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances, through the preparation or review of the Local Plan. At that time, authorities should consider the Green Belt boundaries having regard to their intended permanence in the long term, so that they should be capable of enduring beyond the plan period."
Our Green Belt was established to maintain the division between our two great regional cities, Birmingham and Coventry. I cannot see that any "exceptional circumstances" exist that now necessitate the development of Green Belt when there remain many brown field sites within the borough which could be developed.
I am particularly disappointed that consideration is being given to the development of Frog Lane. A survey of usage would no doubt show that this provides a valuable public amenity providing all weather exercise facilities for a large number of dog owners, families and recreational cyclists. It provides ready access to the beautiful surrounding countryside that is essential for the wellbeing of the local community. Furthermore the plans propose development of Holly Lane Playing Fields, contrary to planning guidance that specifies that "local planning authorities should plan positively to enhance the beneficial use of the Green Belt, such as looking for opportunities to provide access; to provide opportunities for outdoor sport and recreation; to retain and enhance landscapes, visual amenity and biodiversity". These should be protected at all costs. The developments are completely inappropriate.
I would ask you to reconsider all development plans for Balsall Common in view of its position within the Green Belt.