No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 1434
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Mr Andrew Burrow
Proposed locations do not comply with the NPPF, the greenbelt analysis, sustainable locations/transport policies. The greenbelt analysis is flawed, as land to the east of Balsall Common in the narrowest part of the greenbelt has a higher value than other greenbelt. Similarly the land between Dickens Heath and Shirley. Land close to the urban core with all its facilities and a new settlement in north Berkswell are better alternatives, and how can SMBC justify not building in Dorridge with its 3 trains per hour but can in Balsall Common where there is no 30 minute service.
The proposed locations do not comply with the NPPF, the greenbelt analysis, sustainable locations/transport policies. The greenbelt analysis is flawed. Anyone looking at a map can see the land to the east of Balsall Common in the narrowest part of the greenbelt has a higher value than other greenbelt. Similarly the land between Dickins Heath and Shirley. Land close to the urban core with all its facilities and a new settlement in north Berkswell are better alternatives