Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 14520

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: St Philips - Coleshill Heath Road

Agent: Avison Young

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Step 2 of the site selection process relied on planning judgement in respect of various ‘Factors in Favour’ and ‘Factors Against’. No guidance has been given on how the judgment was applied.

‘Land at Coleshill Heath Road’ (Site 131) was relegated from a ‘yellow’ site to a ‘red’ site. This was not supported by the data and evidence base.

The Site Selection Process Topic Paper does not confirm whether any second ‘checking’ assessment has been carried out. Our assumption is the Site Assessments that supported the Supplementary Consultation continue to be relied upon. The Topic Paper excludes ‘amber’ sites, but this would have allowed participants to understand which sites are considered ‘less harmful’.

The Council’s conclusion that the site should be excluded and designated as a ‘red’ site is not justified. Evidence does not demonstrate that effects of development would be “severe or widespread”. Our assessment against the ‘Step 2’ Criteria concludes the site performs positively.

Change suggested by respondent:

Land at Coleshill Heath Road should be removed from the green belt and allocated for housing with a site capacity of 135 dwellings in the Local Plan.

Full text:

Dear Spatial Planning Team

Please find attached representations made on behalf of St Philips on the Solihull MBC Local Plan Publication Stage.

This includes a completed set of Regulation 19 forms and supporting representation, plus appendices, included in a single pdf file.

I would be grateful if you could confirm receipt.