Object
Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020
Representation ID: 14723
Received: 14/12/2020
Respondent: Mr Ian Williams
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Contrary to the assertion in Para 685, Knowle and Bentley Heath is not well served by public transport. This needs to be corrected. If development is to proceed, improvements in bus services are required but no specific proposals in the IDP, other than CIL or s106.
No mention of community access to Arden Academy or to replacement sports provision on KN1 by the community. Relevant Neighbourhood Plan policies should be referenced in the Plan.
Need reference to improvements in primary health care.
Clarify that the settlement is also suitable for limited expansion under option F.
Density constraints should be referenced and appropriate densities set out in policy.
See specific wording as set out in representations.
Delete references to the settlement being well served by public transport.
Include references to the settlement being included in growth options F and G.
Include reference to traffic lights being detrimental in the conservation area.
Include references to Neighbourhood Plan policies.
Include section on primary health care.
Include additional paragraph on density reflecting character and distinctiveness of the area.
See attachments.