No

Draft Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 2670

Received: 14/02/2017

Respondent: Norman McKeown

Representation Summary:

Number of reasons given in objecting to Site 3.

- Balsall Common does not have good accessibility and there are limited employment opportunities.
- Due consideration not given to the 14 Previously Developed Land (PDL) sites in Balsall Common. "Very special circumstances" to justify inappropriate development in the greenbelt have not been demonstrated.
- Should be a re-assessment of the appropriateness of significantly expanding Balsall Common. Consideration should be given to the re-use of all PDL falling within or adjacent to Balsall Common and these should be consulted on

Full text:

see attached letter