No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 2670
Received: 14/02/2017
Respondent: Norman McKeown
Representation Summary:
Number of reasons given in objecting to Site 3.
- Balsall Common does not have good accessibility and there are limited employment opportunities.
- Due consideration not given to the 14 Previously Developed Land (PDL) sites in Balsall Common. "Very special circumstances" to justify inappropriate development in the greenbelt have not been demonstrated.
- Should be a re-assessment of the appropriateness of significantly expanding Balsall Common. Consideration should be given to the re-use of all PDL falling within or adjacent to Balsall Common and these should be consulted on
Full text:
see attached letter