No

Draft Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 3886

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mark Horgan

Agent: Savills

Representation Summary:

Para. 211 should be amended to state shortfall is 37,900.
2,000 figure cannot be relied upon until HMA enters into a MoU.
Housing figure should be increased due to uncertainty around Birmingham shortfall and use of lower end of SHMA requirement range.
Sites in the SHLAA should be allocated through the Plan.
Densities per site should be agreed through concept masterplans rather than a blanket 36dph.
Phasing of sites should be dependent on the market.
Not releasing sites until their phased designation is not positive planning and is contrary to Para.'s 14 and 157 of NPPF.

Full text:

Please find attached our response on behalf of Mark Horgan to the Draft Local Plan Review consultation. We have also attached our Scope, Issues and Options (January 2016) submission for your reference.