No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 419
Received: 25/01/2017
Respondent: Howard Farrand
Representation Summary:
do not think that site 2 (frog lane) is the right location, as it performs less well than site 240 in terms of accessibility to PT (rail transport) which has not been included in the DLP. Also the GB assessment of this site is somewhat subjective and in fact would make GB boundary less defensible.
the sites around dorridge should also be considered for delivering housing.
congestion on roads from existing road users at peak times
Full text:
see attached letter