Q5. Do you agree with the key objectives that development is expected to meet as identified in Policy P1 are appropriate? If not why not? Are there any others you think should be included?

No

Representation ID: 3852

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Ron Shiels

Agent: DS Planning

Lack of confidence that level of residential development will come forward within the plan period.
No certainty on timeframe of HS2 development, UK Central Hub Area in general and precise uses and percentages of different land uses in Hub.
Concern about effects of future Airport plans and its land requirements to expand.

No

Representation ID: 3892

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: IM Properties

Agent: Turley

Economic development ambitions in P1 should be balanced by housing growth in Policy P5.
Important to recognise that in supporting the growth objectives of the WMCA, Solihull is advocating to the Government the capacity to support the delivery of a higher level of job growth on the basis of investment support, and the wider success of the sub-region in attracting greater levels of economic growth.
DLP fails to adequately consider the wider infrastructure implications of the full potential of investment being realised.

No

Representation ID: 4002

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd

Agent: DS Planning

Lack of confidence that level of residential development will come forward within the plan period.
No certainty on timeframe of HS2 development, UK Central Hub Area in general and precise uses and percentages of different land uses in Hub.
Concern about effects of future Airport plans and its land requirements to expand.

No

Representation ID: 4040

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Rosconn Stategic Land

Agent: DS Planning

Lack of confidence that level of residential development will come forward within the plan period.
No certainty on timeframe of HS2 development, UK Central Hub Area in general and precise uses and percentages of different land uses in Hub.
Concern about effects of future Airport plans and its land requirements to expand.

No

Representation ID: 4044

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Stonewater

Agent: DS Planning

Lack of confidence that level of residential development will come forward within the plan period.
No certainty on timeframe of HS2 development, UK Central Hub Area in general and precise uses and percentages of different land uses in Hub.
Concern about effects of future Airport plans and its land requirements to expand.

Yes

Representation ID: 4351

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami

no comment to make

Yes

Representation ID: 4383

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr J Allen

Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd

Generally we agree with the key objectives that development is expected to meet as identified in Policy P1 are appropriate. The proposals would help the local authority in meeting the housing needs across the Borough to include meeting in full their own OAN and assisting with accommodating the HMA wide shortfall, objective B.
It would help secure sustainable economic growth in an area which has regional, national and international importance. Linking and development of these sites, which are all within close proximity to each other, increases accessibility as well as encouraging sustainable modes of travel.

No

Representation ID: 4793

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: L&Q Estates - Land at Bickenhill Road, Marston Green

Agent: Pegasus Group

Unclear how Objective B (in Challenges), meeting housing needs, will be delivered if uplift is not included to meet economic needs.

Yes

Representation ID: 4826

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane

Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd

Generally agree with the key objectives that development is expected to meet as
identified in Policy P1 are appropriate. It would help secure sustainable economic growth in an area which has regional, national and international importance. Linking and development of these sites, which are all within close proximity to each other, increases accessibility as well as encouraging sustainable modes of travel.

No

Representation ID: 4855

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: St Francis Group

Agent: Pegasus Group

Unclear how Objective B (in Challenges), meeting housing needs, will be delivered if uplift is not included to meet economic needs.

Yes

Representation ID: 4881

Received: 17/03/2017

Respondent: Persons with an interest Site 9

Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd

Generally agree with the key objectives that development is expected to meet as
identified in Policy P1 are appropriate. It would help secure sustainable economic growth in an area which has regional, national and international importance. Linking and development of these sites, which are all within close proximity to each other, increases accessibility as well as encouraging sustainable modes of travel.

No

Representation ID: 5313

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover

Agent: Mr Neil Tiley

Welcome policy support provided by Policy P1. However, the objectives would be addressed at planning application stage; a number of which are insufficiently clear and/or appear onerous.
Clarify terms 'growth' and 'place-making'.
E.g. economic development proposals evidently support economic growth. Place-making usually refers to mixed use developments. Unclear how employment-led proposal would support strong, vibrant and healthy communities.

No

Representation ID: 5561

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Prologis UK Limited

The scale of economic development required can be achieved by increasing the scale of the opportunity significantly beyond Employment site 20, which is all that is proposed in this key strategic location.
An Economic Growth Zone providing JLR expansion, Airport expansion and space for complementary development and supply chain for these assets and HS2, in line with SEP and HS2 Growth Strategy targets, can and should be achieved. It will also allow planned works by Highways England to be capitalised upon.

No

Representation ID: 5575

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Cross Consortium

Agent: Turley

The key objectives as identified in Policy P1 should be disaggregated so that it is clear how each economic asset will help to meet them over the course of the plan period.
The proposals for each key economic asset should be subject to site-specific objectives in line with those set out at paragraph 58 of the NPPF
LPR could also include an additional objective based on the demonstration of how development proposals will contribute to the alleviation of persistently high unemployment across pockets of the Borough and facilitate economic growth across the sub-region.

No

Representation ID: 6307

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: IM Land

Agent: Turley

Economic development ambitions in P1 should be balanced by housing growth in Policy P5.
Important to recognise that in supporting the growth objectives of the WMCA, Solihull is advocating to the Government the capacity to support the delivery of a higher level of job growth on the basis of investment support, and the wider success of the sub-region in attracting greater levels of economic growth.
DLP fails to adequately consider the wider infrastructure implications of the full potential of investment being realised.