Q8. Do you believe the right scale and location of development has been identified? If not why not?
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4795
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: L&Q Estates - Land at Bickenhill Road, Marston Green
Agent: Pegasus Group
Concept of Policy P2 is worthy, but difficult to deliver mixed use and high density residential. E.g. apartment development requires significant capital as entire development must be completed prior to completion and occupation.
Advise surplus contingency housing sites are identified due to risk of delivery in town centre.
LPEG recommends 20% surplus.
I am instructed by my client Gallagher Estates to submit representations to the Draft Local Plan Review consultation (December 2016).
The representations comprise of the following submissions:
* Representations to the Solihull Local Plan Review - Draft Local Plan comprising of Pegasus Group Report with accompanying appendices:
o Site Location Plan (Appendix A); o Review of SHELAA (Appendix B); o Review of SMHA (Appendix C);
o Un-met Housing Need and the Duty to Cooperate (Appendix D)
o Chelmer Model Papers (Appendix E)
* Separate Background Documents relating to :
o Land at Damson Parkway , Solihull;
o Land at Four Ashes Road, Dorridge;
o Land off Bickenhill Road, Marston Green and;
o Land off Berkswell Road, Meriden
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4829
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
It is considered that the right scale and location of development has been identified for the main centres considered within Policy P2.
see attached documents
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4857
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: St Francis Group
Agent: Pegasus Group
Concept of Policy P2 is worthy, but difficult to deliver mixed use and high density residential. E.g. apartment development requires significant capital as entire development must be completed prior to completion and occupation.
Advise surplus contingency housing sites are identified due to risk of delivery in town centre.
LPEG recommends 20% surplus.
see submission and supporting documents from agent - Pegasus
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4884
Received: 17/03/2017
Respondent: Persons with an interest Site 9
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
It is considered that the right scale and location of development has been identified for the main centres considered within Policy P2.
see attached documents
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4911
Received: 16/04/2017
Respondent: Teresa Meredith
Opposed to moving Solihull Station, as costly, totally unnecessary and money better spent on social care/education.
I realise I have missed the formal consultation, but wanted to voice my opposition to moving the railway station. It is a costly proposal, totally unnecessary and wrong given the lack of funding in areas such as social care and education. PLEASE DO NOT TO THIS.