Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for IM Properties search
New searchNo
Draft Local Plan Review
Q9. Do you agree with Policy P3? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 6498
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: IM Properties
Agent: Turley
Recommend type of preferred use is expanded to include B2 and B8 as well as B1, and incorporated in Policy P3 text.
SHELAA Ref incorrectly assessed land at Fore; does not reflect information submitted to the Call for Sites, e.g., retail and leisure assessment. Suggest SHELAA is revisited and full site assessed for employment use. Currently not a robust evidence base on these sites for DLP.
Extension of Blythe Valley Park and Fore, and preferred uses for Fore, have been overlooked by DLP.
In respect of the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review consultation please find attached representations which are submitted by Turley on behalf of IM Properties and IM Land.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q7. Do you agree with Policy P2? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 6499
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: IM Properties
Agent: Turley
IM are committed to improving and reinvigorating Mell Square and contribute towards wider improvements to Solihull Town Centre.
Support Policy P2 and Council's intention to allow Town Centre to diversity and for flexibility in terms of the uses which will be considered suitable. This will encourage investment and allow for wider improvements.
Mell Square/Mell Square East 'Preferred Uses' which are established within the Local Plan should allow for greater flexibility. Could successfully accommodate retail, leisure, residential (including PRS) and commercial uses. This should be reflected in Policy P2 and supporting text.
In respect of the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review consultation please find attached representations which are submitted by Turley on behalf of IM Properties and IM Land.
